This is a network of 14 systematic reviews on the salt controversy and their included studies. Each edge in the network represents an inclusion from one systematic review to an article. Systematic reviews were collected from Trinquart (Trinquart, L., Johns, D. M., & Galea, S. (2016). Why do we think we know what we know? A metaknowledge analysis of the salt controversy. International Journal of Epidemiology, 45(1), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyv184 ).
FILE FORMATS
1) Article_list.csv - Unicode CSV
2) Article_attr.csv - Unicode CSV
3) inclusion_net_edges.csv - Unicode CSV
4) potential_inclusion_link.csv - Unicode CSV
5) systematic_review_inclusion_criteria.csv - Unicode CSV
6) Supplementary Reference List.pdf - PDF
ROW EXPLANATIONS
1) Article_list.csv - Each row describes a systematic review or included article.
2) Article_attr.csv - Each row is the attributes of a systematic review/included article.
3) inclusion_net_edges.csv - Each row represents an inclusion from a systematic review to an article.
4) potential_inclusion_link.csv - Each row shows the available evidence base of a systematic review.
5) systematic_review_inclusion_criteria.csv - Each row is the inclusion criteria of a systematic review.
6) Supplementary Reference List.pdf - Each item is a bibliographic record of a systematic review/included paper.
COLUMN HEADER EXPLANATIONS
1) Article_list.csv:
ID - Numeric ID of a paper
paper assigned ID - ID of the paper from Trinquart et al. (2016)
Type - Systematic review / primary study report
Study Groupings - Groupings for related primary study reports from the same report, from Trinquart et al. (2016) (if applicable, otherwise blank)
Title - Title of the paper
year - Publication year of the paper
Attitude - Scientific opinion about the salt controversy from Trinquart et al. (2016)
Doi - DOIs of the paper. (if applicable, otherwise blank)
Retracted (Y/N) - Whether the paper was retracted or withdrawn (Y). Blank if not retracted or withdrawn.
2) Article_attr.csv:
ID - Numeric ID of a paper
year - Publication year
Attitude - Scientific opinion about the salt controversy from Trinquart et al. (2016)
Type - Systematic review/ primary study report
3) inclusion_net_edges.csv:
citing_ID - The numeric ID of a systematic review
cited_ID - The numeric ID of the included articles
4) potential_inclusion_link.csv:
This data was translated from the Sankey diagram given in Trinquart et al. (2016) as Web Figure 4. Each row indicates a systematic review and each column indicates a primary study. In the matrix, "p" indicates that a given primary study had been published as of the search date of a given systematic review.
5)systematic_review_inclusion_criteria.csv:
ID - The numeric IDs of systematic reviews
paper assigned ID - ID of the paper from Trinquart et al. (2016)
attitude - Its scientific opinion about the salt controversy from Trinquart et al. (2016)
No. of studies included - Number of articles included in the systematic review
Study design - Study designs to include, per inclusion criteria
population - Populations to include, per inclusion criteria
Exposure/Intervention - Exposures/Interventions to include, per inclusion criteria
outcome - Study outcomes required for inclusion, per inclusion criteria
Language restriction - Report languages to include, per inclusion criteria
follow-up period - Follow-up period required for inclusion, per inclusion criteria
|