Datasets

Data on permanent plots at Fortuna and the Panama Canal Watershed, Republic of Panama, containing counts and percent of trees with one or more multiple stems >10cm diameter, with and without palms. Accompanying environmental data includes elevation, precipitation, soil type and soil chemical variables (pH, total N, NO3, NO4, resin P, mehlich Ca, K and Mg.

Data in this spreadsheet presents basic information on Cahokia, Mound 72 shell artifacts. This includes taxonomic identifications, provenience, and bead measurements. There are five tabs: 1. Raw data; 2. Disk bead measurements; 3. Columella bead measurements; 4. Data on cups and pendants; and, 5. Information on whole shell beads.

Raw gas exchange data for photosynthetic induction in 6 rice accession flag leaves. Photosynthetic induction and point measurements were made at ambient [CO2]. Two accessions (AUS 278 and IR64) were selected to screen in greater detail in which photosynthetic induction was measured at six [CO2].

This repository contains the datasets and corresponding results for the paper "MAGUS: Multiple Sequence Alignment using Graph Clustering". The Datasets.zip archive contains the ROSE, balibase, Gutell, and RNASim datasets used in our experiments. The Results.zip archive contains the outputs of running our methods against these datasets. Datasets used: ROSE: 10 simulated nucleotide model conditions from the SATe paper, each with 20 replicates, and with 1000 sequences per replicate. The ROSE datasets were originally taken from <a href="https://sites.google.com/eng.ucsd.edu/datasets/alignment/sate-i">https://sites.google.com/eng.ucsd.edu/datasets/alignment/sate-i</a> RNASim: This is a collection of simulated nucleotide datasets that were generated under a model of evolution that reflects selection due to RNA structural constraints. We sampled 20 subsets of 1000 sequences each, as well as 10 subsets of 10000 each, by randomly sampling from the original million-sequence RNASim dataset. Gutell: 16S.M, 16S.3, 16S.T, 16S.B.ALL: Four biological nucleotide datasets from the Comparative Ribosomal Website (CRW) with cleaned reference alignments from SATe. Since PASTA is restricted to datasets without sequence length heterogeneity, these were modified to remove sequences that deviate by more than 20% from the median length. The scrubbed datasets range from 740 to 24,246 sequences. The pre-screened 16S datasets were taken from <a href="https://sites.google.com/eng.ucsd.edu/datasets/alignment/16s23s">https://sites.google.com/eng.ucsd.edu/datasets/alignment/16s23s</a> BAliBASE: We use eight BAliBASE amino acid datasets used in the PASTA paper. As above, we remove outlier sequences, which leaves us with sizes ranging from 195 to 732 sequences. The pre-screened Balibase datasets were taken from <a href="https://sites.google.com/eng.ucsd.edu/datasets/alignment/pastaupp">https://sites.google.com/eng.ucsd.edu/datasets/alignment/pastaupp</a>

Data extracted from Text, Tables and Figures of publications in summarizing crop responses to Free-Air CO2 Elevation (FACE)

Data are from a long-term fire manipulation experiment in the Missouri Ozarks, USA. Data include the raw, annual ring-width increment (rwl), basal area increment (BAI), population-level annual growth resistance (Drs) and resilience (Drl) to drought, intrinsic water use efficiency values (WUEi) and oxygen isotopic composition of individual radial growth rings (δ18O) from southern red oak (Quercus falcata) and post oak (Q. stellata) trees. ---------------------- TITLE: Data for "Sixty-five years of fire manipulation reveals climate and fire interact to determine growth rates of Quercus spp." ---------------------- FILE OVERVIEW: This dataset contains four (4) CSV files as described below: Refsland_et_al_ECS20-0465_BAI.csv: annual basal area increment between 1948-2015 for trees across the fire manipulation experiment Refsland_et_al_ECS20-0465_DroughtIndices.csv: population-level drought resistance and resilience of trees during each target drought period Refsland_et_al_ECS20-0465_WUEi.csv: carbon isotope indicators of drought stress for trees across the fire manipulation experiment Refsland_et_al_ECS20-0465_d18Or.csv: oxygen isotope indicators of drought stress for trees across the fire manipulation experiment ---------------------- VARIABLE EXPLANATION: All the variables in those four files are explained as below: treeID: unique character string that identifies subject tree block: integer (1, 2) that identifies the study block plot: integer (1-12) that identifies the plot nested within each study block trt: character string (Annual, Control, Periodic) that identifies the fire treatment of a given plot species: character string (Quercus falcata, Quercus stellata) that identifies species of subject tree year: integer (1948-2015) that identifies the dated year of each tree ring rwl_mm: numerical value representing the annual tree ring-width, in mm bai_cm2: numerical value representing the annual basal area increment, in cm2 timeperiod: integer value (1953, 1964, 2007, 2012) representing the periods encompassing target dry and wet years Drs_2yr: numerical value representing the drought resistance, defined as the population-level annual growth of trees during drought years relative to pre-drought years for a given time period Drl_2yr: numerical value representing the drought resilience, defined as the population-level annual growth of trees following drought years relative to pre-drought years for a given time period stand_ba_m2ha: numerical value representing the total basal area of a given plot, in m2 per ha stand_density_stems_ha: numerical value representing the total stem density of a given plot, in stems per ha pool: numerical value (1-40) identifying the set of tree ring samples pooled for analysis. Samples were pooled by block, plot, year and species period: integer value (1953, 1964, 1980, 2007, 2012) representing the periods encompassing target dry and wet years type: character string (Dry, Wet) indicating the water availability of a given year d13C: numerical value representing the carbon isotopic composition of radial growth rings within a given sample pool, in per mil WUEi: numerical value representing the annual intrinsic water use efficiency of radial growth rings within a given sample pool d18O: numerical value representing the oxygen isotopic composition of radial growth rings within a given sample pool, in per mil

These are text files downloaded from the Web of Science for the bibliographic analyses found in Zinnen et al. (2020) in Applied Vegetation Science. They represent the papers and reference lists from six expert-based indicator systems: Floristic Quality Assessment, hemeroby, naturalness indicator values (& social behaviors), Ellenberg indicator values, grassland utilization values, and urbanity indicator values. To examine data, download VOSviewer and see instructrions from van Eck & Waltman (2019) for how to upload data. Although we used bibliographic coupling, there are a number of other interesting bibliographic analyses you can use with these data (e.g., visualizing citations between journals from this set of documents). Note: There are two caveats to note about these data and Supplements 1 & 2 associated with our paper. First, there are some overlapping papers in these text files (i.e., raw data). When added individually, the papers sum to more than the numbers we give. However, when combined VOSviewer recognizes these as repeats, and matches the numbers we list in S1 and the manuscript. Second, we labelled the downloaded papers in S2 with their respective systems. In some cases, the labels do not completely match our counts listed in S1 and raw data. This is because some of these papers use another system, but were not captured in our systematic literature search (e.g., a paper may have used hemeroby, but was not picked up by WoS, so this paper is not listed as one of the 52 hemeroby papers).

This data set includes information used to determine patterns of mixing at three small confluences in East Central Illinois based on differences in the temperature or turbidity of the two confluent flows.

This file contains 13 unique case studies that were created for the One health: Infectious diseases course offered at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign campus. The case studies are being made available as educational resources for other One health courses. Each case study is focused on a theme/topic which is associated with One health. These case studies were created using publicly available information and references have been provided for each case study.

These data are from an observational study and small experiment investigating reproductive biology and hybridization between two plants, Celastrus scandens L. and Celastrus orbiculatus Thunb. (Celastraceae). These data were collected during the 2008 growing season from the Indiana Dunes National Park (formerly Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore), just east of the municipality of Ogden Dunes, Indiana, USA. The five data files provide information on floral output of the two species, fertilization rate, fruit set rate, hybridization rate at two scales (individual flowers in both species, individual maternal plants in C. scandens), and the results of a hand-pollination experiment that exchanged pollen between the two species. There are six data files associated with this submission, five data files in comma-separated values format and one text file (‘readme.txt’) that includes detailed explanations of the data files.

This is a network of 14 systematic reviews on the salt controversy and their included studies. Each edge in the network represents an inclusion from one systematic review to an article. Systematic reviews were collected from Trinquart (Trinquart, L., Johns, D. M., & Galea, S. (2016). Why do we think we know what we know? A metaknowledge analysis of the salt controversy. International Journal of Epidemiology, 45(1), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyv184 ). <b>FILE FORMATS</b> 1) Article_list.csv - Unicode CSV 2) Article_attr.csv - Unicode CSV 3) inclusion_net_edges.csv - Unicode CSV 4) potential_inclusion_link.csv - Unicode CSV 5) systematic_review_inclusion_criteria.csv - Unicode CSV 6) Supplementary Reference List.pdf - PDF <b>ROW EXPLANATIONS</b> 1) Article_list.csv - Each row describes a systematic review or included article. 2) Article_attr.csv - Each row is the attributes of a systematic review/included article. 3) inclusion_net_edges.csv - Each row represents an inclusion from a systematic review to an article. 4) potential_inclusion_link.csv - Each row shows the available evidence base of a systematic review. 5) systematic_review_inclusion_criteria.csv - Each row is the inclusion criteria of a systematic review. 6) Supplementary Reference List.pdf - Each item is a bibliographic record of a systematic review/included paper. <b>COLUMN HEADER EXPLANATIONS</b> <b>1) Article_list.csv:</b> ID - Numeric ID of a paper paper assigned ID - ID of the paper from Trinquart et al. (2016) Type - Systematic review / primary study report Study Groupings - Groupings for related primary study reports from the same report, from Trinquart et al. (2016) (if applicable, otherwise blank) Title - Title of the paper year - Publication year of the paper Attitude - Scientific opinion about the salt controversy from Trinquart et al. (2016) Doi - DOIs of the paper. (if applicable, otherwise blank) Retracted (Y/N) - Whether the paper was retracted or withdrawn (Y). Blank if not retracted or withdrawn. <b>2) Article_attr.csv:</b> ID - Numeric ID of a paper year - Publication year Attitude - Scientific opinion about the salt controversy from Trinquart et al. (2016) Type - Systematic review/ primary study report <b>3) inclusion_net_edges.csv:</b> citing_ID - The numeric ID of a systematic review cited_ID - The numeric ID of the included articles <b>4) potential_inclusion_link.csv:</b> This data was translated from the Sankey diagram given in Trinquart et al. (2016) as Web Figure 4. Each row indicates a systematic review and each column indicates a primary study. In the matrix, "p" indicates that a given primary study had been published as of the search date of a given systematic review. <b>5)systematic_review_inclusion_criteria.csv:</b> ID - The numeric IDs of systematic reviews paper assigned ID - ID of the paper from Trinquart et al. (2016) attitude - Its scientific opinion about the salt controversy from Trinquart et al. (2016) No. of studies included - Number of articles included in the systematic review Study design - Study designs to include, per inclusion criteria population - Populations to include, per inclusion criteria Exposure/Intervention - Exposures/Interventions to include, per inclusion criteria outcome - Study outcomes required for inclusion, per inclusion criteria Language restriction - Report languages to include, per inclusion criteria follow-up period - Follow-up period required for inclusion, per inclusion criteria

This dataset contains experimental measurements used in the paper, "Ultra-sensitivity of Numerical Landscape Evolution Models to their Initial Conditions." (to be submitted). The data is taken from experimental runs in a miniature landscape model named the eXperimental Landscape Evolution (XLE) facility. In this facility, we complete five >24hr runs at 5 minute temporal resolution. Every five minutes, an planform image was capture, and a digital elevation model (DEM) was generated. For each run, images and a corresponding animation of images are documented. In addition,ASCII formatted DEMs along with color hillshade maps were generated. The hillshade map images were also made into an animation. This dataset is associated with the following publication: https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083305

Original leaf gas exchange and absorptance data used in the Collison et al. (2020) Light, Not Age, Underlies the Q9 Maladaptation of Maize and Miscanthus Photosynthesis to Self-Shading - Frontiers in Plant Science doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00783

This dataset is a snapshot of the presence and structure of entrepreneurship education in U.S. four-year colleges and universities in 2015, including co-curricular activities and related infrastructure. Public, private not-for-profit and for-profit institutions are included, as are specialized four-year institutions. The dataset provides insight into the presence of entrepreneurship education both within business units and in other units of college campuses. Entrepreneurship is defined broadly, to include small business management and related career-focused options.

This data has tweets collected in paper Shubhanshu Mishra, Sneha Agarwal, Jinlong Guo, Kirstin Phelps, Johna Picco, and Jana Diesner. 2014. Enthusiasm and support: alternative sentiment classification for social movements on social media. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM conference on Web science (WebSci '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 261-262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2615569.2615667 The data only contains tweet IDs and the corresponding enthusiasm and support labels by two different annotators.

Terrorism is among the most pressing challenges to democratic governance around the world. The Responsible Terrorism Coverage (or ResTeCo) project aims to address a fundamental dilemma facing 21st century societies: how to give citizens the information they need without giving terrorists the kind of attention they want. The ResTeCo hopes to inform best practices by using extreme-scale text analytic methods to extract information from more than 70 years of terrorism-related media coverage from around the world and across 5 languages. Our goal is to expand the available data on media responses to terrorism and enable the development of empirically-validated models for socially responsible, effective news organizations. This particular dataset contains information extracted from terrorism-related stories in the New York Times published between 1945 and 2018. It includes variables that measure the relative share of terrorism-related topics, the valence and intensity of emotional language, as well as the people, places, and organizations mentioned. This dataset contains 3 files: 1. <i>"ResTeCo Project NYT Dataset Variable Descriptions.pdf"</i> <ul> <li>A detailed codebook containing a summary of the Responsible Terrorism Coverage (ResTeCo) Project New York Times (NYT) Dataset and descriptions of all variables. </li> </ul> 2. <i>"resteco-nyt.csv"</i> <ul><li>This file contains the data extracted from terrorism-related media coverage in the New York Times between 1945 and 2018. It includes variables that measure the relative share of topics, sentiment, and emotion present in this coverage. There are also variables that contain metadata and list the people, places, and organizations mentioned in these articles. There are 53 variables and 438,373 observations. The variable "id" uniquely identifies each observation. Each observation represents a single news article. </li> <li> <b>Please note</b> that care should be taken when using "respect-nyt.csv". The file may not be suitable to use in a spreadsheet program like Excel as some of the values get to be quite large. Excel cannot handle some of these large values, which may cause the data to appear corrupted within the software. It is encouraged that a user of this data use a statistical package such as Stata, R, or Python to ensure the structure and quality of the data remains preserved.</li> </ul> 3. <i>"README.md"</i> <ul><li>This file contains useful information for the user about the dataset. It is a text file written in mark down language</li> </ul> <b>Citation Guidelines</b> 1) To cite this codebook please use the following citation: Althaus, Scott, Joseph Bajjalieh, Marc Jungblut, Dan Shalmon, Subhankar Ghosh, and Pradnyesh Joshi. 2020. Responsible Terrorism Coverage (ResTeCo) Project New York Times (NYT) Dataset Variable Descriptions. Responsible Terrorism Coverage (ResTeCo) Project New York Times Dataset. Cline Center for Advanced Social Research. May 13. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. doi: 10.13012/B2IDB-4638196_V1 2) To cite the data please use the following citation: Althaus, Scott, Joseph Bajjalieh, Marc Jungblut, Dan Shalmon, Subhankar Ghosh, and Pradnyesh Joshi. 2020. Responsible Terrorism Coverage (ResTeCo) Project New York Times Dataset. Cline Center for Advanced Social Research. May 13. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. doi: 10.13012/B2IDB-4638196_V1

Automatic and manual counts of black flies captured in Illinois.

Nest survival and Fledgling production data for Bell's Vireo and Willow Flycatcher nests.

Raw measurement data for umbilical remnants (umbilical vein, umbilical arteries and urachus) in support of Equine Veterinary Journal publication "Normal Regression of the Internal Umbilical Remnant Structures in Standardbred Foals."

Data on bank elevations determined from lidar data for the Upper Sangamon River, Illinois, the Mission River, Texas, and the White River in Indiana

This dataset inventories the availability of entrepreneurship and small business education, including co-curricular opportunities, in two-year colleges in the United States. The inventory provides a snapshot of activities at more than 1,650 public, not-for-profit, and private for-profit institutions, in 2014.

Dataset associated with Hoover et al AUK-19-093 submission: Local conspecific density does not influence reproductive output in a secondary cavity-nesting songbird. Excel CSV with all of the data used in analyses. Description of variables YEARS: year ORDINAL_DATE: number for what day of the year it is with 1 January = 1,……30 December = 365 SITE: acronym for each study site BOX: unique nest box identifier on each study site TREAT: designates whether nest box was in a high- or low- nest box density area within each study site ACTUAL_NO_NEIGHBORS: number of pairs of warblers using a nest box within 200 m of a given pair’s nest box CLUTCH_SIZE: number of warbler eggs in nest at the onset of incubation PROWN: number of warbler nestlings once eggs have hatched PROWF: number of warbler nestlings that fledged out of the nest box HATCH_SUCCESS: proportion of eggs in the nest that hatched FLEDG_SUCCESS: proportion of the nestlings that fledged from the nest box HATCH_SUCCESS2: binary category where “0” indicates there was some, and “1” indicates there was no hatching failure FLEDG_SUCCESS2: binary category where “0” indicates there was some, and “1” indicates there was no nestling failure (i.e. nestling death) BHCO_PARASIT2: binary category where “0” indicates no cowbird parasitism, and “1” indicates there was cowbird parasitism BHCOE: number of cowbird eggs in clutch BHCOF: number of cowbird nestlings that fledged from the nest PAIRID: unique number that identifies a male and female warbler that are together at a nest box and this number is the same in a subsequent nesting attempt or year if the same male and female are together again FEMALE_ID: unique identifier for each female which represents her leg band combination. Each letter represents a band with letters preceding the hyphen being on the right leg and after the hyphen the left leg FEM_AGE: binary category where “0” indicates a 1-year-old bird and “1” indicates a >1-year-old bird FEMALE_BREEDING_ATTEMPT: “1” indicates first, “2” indicates second,……..breeding attempt within a given year SECOND_ATTEMPT: for any female that fledged a brood in a given year, binary category where “0” represents that they did not, and “1” indicates that they did attempt a second brood that year F_TOT_PROWF: total reproductive output (number of warbler fledglings produced) for a given female in a given year MALE_ID: unique identifier for each male which represents his leg band combination. Each letter represents a band with letters preceding the hyphen being on the right leg and after the hyphen the left leg MALE_AGE2: binary category where “0” indicates a 1-year-old bird and “1” indicates a >1-year-old bird Provisioning_rate: total number of food provisions per nestling per hour by male and female warbler combined BROOD_MASS: average nestling mass (g) for the brood BROOD_TARSUS: average nestling tarsus length (mm) for the brood Brood_condition: unit-less index of nestling condition that uses the residuals of the BROOD_MASS/BROOD_TARSUS relationship A period (“.”) represents where data were not collected, not available, or because individual nest or female did not qualify for consideration of a category assignment. An empty cell represents no data available for this particular cell.

These data were collected for an experiment examining effects of neonicotinoid (clothianidin) presence on hover fly (Diptera: Syrphidae) behavior. Hover flies of two species (Eristalis arbustorum and Toxomerus marginatus) were offered a choice to feed on artificial flowers laced with sucrose solution that was either contaminated (CLO) or not contaminated (CON) with clothianidin. Two different concentrations of clothianidin in 0.5 M sucrose solution were tested: 2.5 ppb and 150 ppb. We conducted four sets of 10 trials, each trial set examining a different combination of species and clothianidin dose. Across 6 hours of video for each trial we recorded 1) number of visits to each flower that resulted in feeding, and 2) amount of time spent feeding during each visit. We found that while neither species fed significantly longer on either of the solutions, E. arbustorum appeared to avoid flowers with clothianidin particularly at high rates. In the paper, we attribute this avoidance response, partially, to hover fly-visible spectral differences between the two flower choices and discuss potential implications for field and lab-based studies. In the enclosed zip file we have included all data for this project and code scripts from R. * Note: Data folder contains 4 files (instead of 6 as mentioned in Readme): e.tenax_photoreceptors.csv; hoverfly_data_UPDATE.csv; number_visits_UPDATE.csv; and Original 2018 hover fly choice test data_Clem2020.xlsx

Citation context annotation for papers citing retracted paper Matsuyama 2005 (RETRACTED: Matsuyama W, Mitsuyama H, Watanabe M, Oonakahara KI, Higashimoto I, Osame M, Arimura K. Effects of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on inflammatory markers in COPD. Chest. 2005 Dec 1;128(6):3817-27.), retracted in 2008 (Retraction in: Chest (2008) 134:4 (893) <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-3692(08)60339-6">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-3692(08)60339-6<a/> ). This is part of the supplemental data for Jodi Schneider, Di Ye, Alison Hill, and Ashley Whitehorn. "Continued Citation of a Fraudulent Clinical Trial Report, Eleven Years after it was retracted for Falsifying Data" [R&R under review with Scientometrics]. Overall we found 148 citations to the retracted paper from 2006 to 2019, However, this dataset does not include the annotations described in the 2015. in Ashley Fulton, Alison Coates, Marie Williams, Peter Howe, and Alison Hill. "Persistent citation of the only published randomized controlled trial of omega-3 supplementation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease six years after its retraction." Publications 3, no. 1 (2015): 17-26. In this dataset 70 new and newly found citations are listed: 66 annotated citations and 4 pending citations (non-annotated since we don't have full-text). "New citations" refer to articles published from March 25, 2014 to 2019, found in Google Scholar and Web of Science. "Newly found citations" refer articles published 2006-2013, found in Google Scholar and Web of Science, but not previously covered in Ashley Fulton, Alison Coates, Marie Williams, Peter Howe, and Alison Hill. "Persistent citation of the only published randomised controlled trial of omega-3 supplementation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease six years after its retraction." Publications 3, no. 1 (2015): 17-26. NOTES: This is Unicode data. Some publication titles & quotes are in non-Latin characters and they may contain commas, quotation marks, etc. FILES/FILE FORMATS Same data in two formats: 2006-2019-new-citation-contexts-to-Matsuyama.csv - Unicode CSV (preservation format only) 2006-2019-new-citation-contexts-to-Matsuyama.xlsx - Excel workbook (preferred format) ROW EXPLANATIONS 70 rows of data - one citing publication per row COLUMN HEADER EXPLANATIONS Note - processing notes Annotation pending - Y or blank Year Published - publication year ID - ID corresponding to the network analysis. See Ye, Di; Schneider, Jodi (2019): Network of First and Second-generation citations to Matsuyama 2005 from Google Scholar and Web of Science. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. <a href="https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-1403534_V2">https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-1403534_V2</a> Title - item title (some have non-Latin characters, commas, etc.) Official Translated Title - item title in English, as listed in the publication Machine Translated Title - item title in English, translated by Google Scholar Language - publication language Type - publication type (e.g., bachelor's thesis, blog post, book chapter, clinical guidelines, Cochrane Review, consumer-oriented evidence summary, continuing education journal article, journal article, letter to the editor, magazine article, Master's thesis, patent, Ph.D. thesis, textbook chapter, training module) Book title for book chapters - Only for a book chapter - the book title University for theses - for bachelor's thesis, Master's thesis, Ph.D. thesis - the associated university Pre/Post Retraction - "Pre" for 2006-2008 (means published before the October 2008 retraction notice or in the 2 months afterwards); "Post" for 2009-2019 (considered post-retraction for our analysis) Identifier where relevant - ISBN, Patent ID, PMID (only for items we considered hard to find/identify, e.g. those without a DOI-based URL) URL where available - URL, ideally a DOI-based URL Reference number/style - reference Only in bibliography - Y or blank Acknowledged - If annotated, Y, Not relevant as retraction not published yet, or N (blank otherwise) Positive / "Poor Research" (Negative) - P for positive, N for negative if annotated; blank otherwise Human translated quotations - Y or blank; blank means Google scholar was used to translate quotations for Translated Quotation X Specific/in passing (overall) - Specific if any of the 5 quotations are specific [aggregates Specific / In Passing (Quotation X)] Quotation 1 - First quotation (or blank) (includes non-Latin characters in some cases) Translated Quotation 1 - English translation of "Quotation 1" (or blank) Specific / In Passing (Quotation 1) - Specific if "Quotation 1" refers to methods or results of the Matsuyama paper (or blank) What is referenced from Matsuyama (Quotation 1) - Methods; Results; or Methods and Results - blank if "Quotation 1" not specific, no associated quotation, or not yet annotated Quotation 2 - Second quotation (includes non-Latin characters in some cases) Translated Quotation 2 - English translation of "Quotation 2" Specific / In Passing (Quotation 2) - Specific if "Quotation 2" refers to methods or results of the Matsuyama paper (or blank) What is referenced from Matsuyama (Quotation 2) - Methods; Results; or Methods and Results - blank if "Quotation 2" not specific, no associated quotation, or not yet annotated Quotation 3 - Third quotation (includes non-Latin characters in some cases) Translated Quotation 3 - English translation of "Quotation 3" Specific / In Passing (Quotation 3) - Specific if "Quotation 3" refers to methods or results of the Matsuyama paper (or blank) What is referenced from Matsuyama (Quotation 3) - Methods; Results; or Methods and Results - blank if "Quotation 3" not specific, no associated quotation, or not yet annotated Quotation 4 - Fourth quotation (includes non-Latin characters in some cases) Translated Quotation 4 - English translation of "Quotation 4" Specific / In Passing (Quotation 4) - Specific if "Quotation 4" refers to methods or results of the Matsuyama paper (or blank) What is referenced from Matsuyama (Quotation 4) - Methods; Results; or Methods and Results - blank if "Quotation 4" not specific, no associated quotation, or not yet annotated Quotation 5 - Fifth quotation (includes non-Latin characters in some cases) Translated Quotation 5 - English translation of "Quotation 5" Specific / In Passing (Quotation 5) - Specific if "Quotation 5" refers to methods or results of the Matsuyama paper (or blank) What is referenced from Matsuyama (Quotation 5) - Methods; Results; or Methods and Results - blank if "Quotation 5" not specific, no associated quotation, or not yet annotated Further Notes - additional notes