Datasets

This dataset contains data from extreme-disagreement analysis described in paper “Aaron M. Cohen, Jodi Schneider, Yuanxi Fu, Marian S. McDonagh, Prerna Das, Arthur W. Holt, Neil R. Smalheiser, 2021, Fifty Ways to Tag your Pubtypes: Multi-Tagger, a Set of Probabilistic Publication Type and Study Design Taggers to Support Biomedical Indexing and Evidence-Based Medicine.” In this analysis, our team experts carried out an independent formal review and consensus process for extreme disagreements between MEDLINE indexing and model predictive scores. “Extreme disagreements” included two situations: (1) an abstract was MEDLINE indexed as a publication type but received low scores for this publication type, and (2) an abstract received high scores for a publication type but lacked the corresponding MEDLINE index term. “High predictive score” is defined as the top 100 high-scoring, and “low predictive score” is defined as the bottom 100 low-scoring. Three publication types were analyzed, which are CASE_CONTROL_STUDY, COHORT_STUDY, and CROSS_SECTIONAL_STUDY. Results were recorded in three Excel workbooks, named after the publication types: case_control_study.xlsx, cohort_study.xlsx, and cross_sectional_study.xlsx. The analysis shows that, when the tagger gave a high predictive score (>0.9) on articles that lacked a corresponding MEDLINE indexing term, independent review suggested that the model assignment was correct in almost all cases (CROSS_SECTIONAL_STUDY (99%), CASE_CONTROL_STUDY (94.9%), and COHORT STUDY (92.2%)). Conversely, when articles received MEDLINE indexing but model predictive scores were very low (<0.1), independent review suggested that the model assignment was correct in the majority of cases: CASE_CONTROL_STUDY (85.4%), COHORT STUDY (76.3%), and CROSS_SECTIONAL_STUDY (53.6%). Based on the extreme disagreement analysis, we identified a number of false-positives (FPs) and false-negatives (FNs). For case control study, there were 5 FPs and 14 FNs. For cohort study, there were 7 FPs and 22 FNs. For cross-sectional study, there were 1 FP and 45 FNs. We reviewed and grouped them based on patterns noticed, providing clues for further improving the models. This dataset reports the instances of FPs and FNs along with their categorizations.

Terrorism is among the most pressing challenges to democratic governance around the world. The Responsible Terrorism Coverage (or ResTeCo) project aims to address a fundamental dilemma facing 21st century societies: how to give citizens the information they need without giving terrorists the kind of attention they want. The ResTeCo hopes to inform best practices by using extreme-scale text analytic methods to extract information from more than 70 years of terrorism-related media coverage from around the world and across 5 languages. Our goal is to expand the available data on media responses to terrorism and enable the development of empirically-validated models for socially responsible, effective news organizations. This particular dataset contains information extracted from terrorism-related stories in the Foreign Broadcast Information Service (FBIS) published between 1995 and 2013. It includes variables that measure the relative share of terrorism-related topics, the valence and intensity of emotional language, as well as the people, places, and organizations mentioned. This dataset contains 3 files: 1. "ResTeCo Project FBIS Dataset Variable Descriptions.pdf" A detailed codebook containing a summary of the Responsible Terrorism Coverage (ResTeCo) Project Foreign Broadcast Information Service (FBIS) Dataset and descriptions of all variables. 2. "resteco-fbis.csv" This file contains the data extracted from terrorism-related media coverage in the Foreign Broadcast Information Service (FBIS) between 1995 and 2013. It includes variables that measure the relative share of topics, sentiment, and emotion present in this coverage. There are also variables that contain metadata and list the people, places, and organizations mentioned in these articles. There are 53 variables and 750,971 observations. The variable "id" uniquely identifies each observation. Each observation represents a single news article. Please note that care should be taken when using "resteco-fbis.csv". The file may not be suitable to use in a spreadsheet program like Excel as some of the values get to be quite large. Excel cannot handle some of these large values, which may cause the data to appear corrupted within the software. It is encouraged that a user of this data use a statistical package such as Stata, R, or Python to ensure the structure and quality of the data remains preserved. 3. "README.md" This file contains useful information for the user about the dataset. It is a text file written in mark down language Citation Guidelines 1) To cite this codebook please use the following citation: Althaus, Scott, Joseph Bajjalieh, Marc Jungblut, Dan Shalmon, Subhankar Ghosh, and Pradnyesh Joshi. 2020. Responsible Terrorism Coverage (ResTeCo) Project Foreign Broadcast Information Service (FBIS) Dataset Variable Descriptions. Responsible Terrorism Coverage (ResTeCo) Project Foreign Broadcast Information Service (FBIS) Dataset. Cline Center for Advanced Social Research. December 16. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. doi: https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-6360821_V1 2) To cite the data please use the following citation: Althaus, Scott, Joseph Bajjalieh, Marc Jungblut, Dan Shalmon, Subhankar Ghosh, and Pradnyesh Joshi. 2020. Responsible Terrorism Coverage (ResTeCo) Project Foreign Broadcast Information Service (FBIS) Dataset. Cline Center for Advanced Social Research. December 16. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. doi: https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-6360821_V1

Prepared by Vetle Torvik 2021-05-07 The dataset comes as a single tab-delimited Latin-1 encoded file (only the City column uses non-ASCII characters). • How was the dataset created? The dataset is based on a snapshot of PubMed (which includes Medline and PubMed-not-Medline records) taken in December, 2018. (NLMs baseline 2018 plus updates throughout 2018). Affiliations are linked to a particular author on a particular article. Prior to 2014, NLM recorded the affiliation of the first author only. However, MapAffil 2018 covers some PubMed records lacking affiliations that were harvested elsewhere, from PMC (e.g., PMID 22427989), NIH grants (e.g., 1838378), and Microsoft Academic Graph and ADS (e.g. 5833220). Affiliations are pre-processed (e.g., transliterated into ASCII from UTF-8 and html) so they may differ (sometimes a lot; see PMID 27487542) from PubMed records. All affiliation strings where processed using the MapAffil procedure, to identify and disambiguate the most specific place-name, as described in: Torvik VI. MapAffil: A bibliographic tool for mapping author affiliation strings to cities and their geocodes worldwide. D-Lib Magazine 2015; 21 (11/12). 10p • Look for Fig. 4 in the following article for coverage statistics over time: Palmblad, M., Torvik, V.I. Spatiotemporal analysis of tropical disease research combining Europe PMC and affiliation mapping web services. Trop Med Health 45, 33 (2017). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-017-0073-6">https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-017-0073-6</a> Expect to see big upticks in coverage of PMIDs around 1988 and for non-first authors in 2014. • The code and back-end data is periodically updated and made available for query by PMID at http://abel.ischool.illinois.edu/cgi-bin/mapaffil/search.py • What is the format of the dataset? The dataset contains 52,931,957 rows (plus a header row). Each row (line) in the file has a unique PMID and author order, and contains the following eighteen columns, tab-delimited. All columns are ASCII, except city which contains Latin-1. 1. PMID: positive non-zero integer; int(10) unsigned 2. au_order: positive non-zero integer; smallint(4) 3. lastname: varchar(80) 4. firstname: varchar(80); NLM started including these in 2002 but many have been harvested from outside PubMed 5. initial_2: middle name initial 6. orcid: From 2019 ORCID Public Data File https://orcid.org/ and from PubMed XML 7. year: year of the publication 8. journal: name of journal that the publication is published 9. affiliation: author's affiliation?? 10. disciplines: extracted from departments, divisions, schools, laboratories, centers, etc. that occur on at least unique 100 affiliations across the dataset, some with standardization (e.g., 1770799), English translations (e.g., 2314876), or spelling corrections (e.g., 1291843) 11. grid: inferred using a high-recall technique focused on educational institutions (but, for experimental purposes, includes a few select hospitals, national institutes/centers, international companies, governmental agencies, and 200+ other IDs [RINGGOLD, Wikidata, ISNI, VIAF, http] for institutions not in GRID). Based on 2019 GRID version https://www.grid.ac/ 12. type: EDU, HOS, EDU-HOS, ORG, COM, GOV, MIL, UNK 13. city: varchar(200); typically 'city, state, country' but could include further subdivisions; unresolved ambiguities are concatenated by '|' 14. state: Australia, Canada and USA (which includes territories like PR, GU, AS, and post-codes like AE and AA) 15. country 16. lat: at most 3 decimals (only available when city is not a country or state) 17. lon: at most 3 decimals (only available when city is not a country or state) 18. fips: varchar(5); for USA only retrieved by lat-lon query to https://geo.fcc.gov/api/census/block/find

The dataset is based on a snapshot of PubMed taken in December 2018 (NLMs baseline 2018 plus updates throughout 2018), and for ORCIDs, primarily, the 2019 ORCID Public Data File https://orcid.org/. Matching an ORCID to an individual author name on a PMID is a non-trivial process. Anyone can create an ORCID and claim to have contributed to any published work. Many records claim too many articles and most claim too few. Even though ORCID records are (most?) often populated by author name searches in popular bibliographic databases, there is no confirmation that the person's name is listed on the article. This dataset is the product of mapping ORCIDs to individual author names on PMIDs, even when the ORCID name does not match any author name on the PMID, and when there are multiple (good) candidate author names. The algorithm avoids assigning the ORCID to an article when there are no good candidates and when there are multiple equally good matches. For some ORCIDs that clearly claim too much, it triggers a very strict matching procedure (for ORCIDs that claim too much but the majority appear correct, e.g., 0000-0002-2788-5457), and sometimes deletes ORCIDs altogether when all (or nearly all) of its claimed PMIDs appear incorrect. When an individual clearly has multiple ORCIDs it deletes the least complete of them (e.g., 0000-0002-1651-2428 vs 0000-0001-6258-4628). It should be noted that the ORCIDs that claim to much are not necessarily due nefarious or trolling intentions, even though a few appear so. Certainly many are are due to laziness, such as claiming everything with a particular last name. Some cases appear to be due to test engineers (e.g., 0000-0001-7243-8157; 0000-0002-1595-6203), or librarians assisting faculty (e.g., ; 0000-0003-3289-5681), or group/laboratory IDs (0000-0003-4234-1746), or having contributed to an article in capacities other than authorship such as an Investigator, an Editor, or part of a Collective (e.g., 0000-0003-2125-4256 as part of the FlyBase Consortium on PMID 22127867), or as a "Reply To" in which case the identity of the article and authors might be conflated. The NLM has, in the past, limited the total number of authors indexed too. The dataset certainly has errors but I have taken great care to fix some glaring ones (individuals who claim to much), while still capturing authors who have published under multiple names and not explicitly listed them in their ORCID profile. The final dataset provides a "matchscore" that could be used for further clean-up. Four files: person.tsv: 7,194,692 rows, including header 1. orcid 2. lastname 3. firstname 4. creditname 5. othernames 6. otherids 7. emails employment.tsv: 2,884,981 rows, including header 1. orcid 2. putcode 3. role 4. start-date 5. end-date 6. id 7. source 8. dept 9. name 10. city 11. region 12 country 13. affiliation education.tsv: 3,202,253 rows, including header 1. orcid 2. putcode 3. role 4. start-date 5. end-date 6. id 7. source 8. dept 9. name 10. city 11. region 12 country 13. affiliation pubmed2orcid.tsv: 13,133,065 rows, including header 1. PMID 2. au_order (author name position on the article) 3. orcid 4. matchscore (see below) 5. source: orcid (2019 ORCID Public Data File https://orcid.org/), pubmed (NLMs distributed XML files), or patci (an earlier version of ORCID with citations processed through the Patci tool) 12,037,375 from orcid; 1,06,5892 from PubMed XML; 29,797 from Patci matchscore: 000: lastname, firstname and middle init match (e.g., Eric T MacKenzie vs 00: lastname, firstname match (e.g., Keith Ward) 0: lastname, firstname reversed match (e.g., Conde Santiago vs Santiago Conde) 1: lastname, first and middle init match (e.g., L. F. Panchenko) 11: lastname and partial firstname match (e.g., Mike Boland vs Michael Boland or Mel Ziman vs Melanie Ziman) 12: lastname and first init match 15: 3 part lastname and firstname match (David Grahame Hardie vs D Grahame Hardie) 2: lastname match and multipart firstname initial match Maria Dolores Suarez Ortega vs M. D. Suarez 22: partial lastname match and firstname match (e.g., Erika Friedmann vs Erika Friedman) 23: e.g., Antonio Garcia Garcia vs A G Garcia 25: Allan Downie vs J A Downie 26: Oliver Racz vs Oliver Bacz 27: Rita Ostrovskaya vs R U Ostrovskaia 29: Andrew Staehelin vs L A Staehlin 3: M Tronko vs N D Tron'ko 4: Sharon Dent (Also known as Sharon Y.R. Dent; Sharon Y Roth; Sharon Yoder) vs Sharon Yoder 45: Okulov Aleksei vs A B Okulov 48: Maria Del Rosario Garcia De Vicuna Pinedo vs R Garcia-Vicuna 49: Anatoliy Ivashchenko vs A Ivashenko 5 = lastname match only (weak match but sometimes captures alternative first name for better subsequent matches); e.g., Bill Hieb vs W F Hieb 6 = first name match only (weak match but sometimes captures alternative first name for better subsequent matches); e.g., Maria Borawska vs Maria Koscielak 7 = last or first name match on "other names"; e.g., Hromokovska Tetiana (Also known as Gromokovskaia, T. S., Громоковська Тетяна) vs T Gromokovskaia 77: Siva Subramanian vs Kolinjavadi N. Sivasubramanian 88 = no name in orcid but match caught by uniqueness of name across paper (at least 90% and 2 more than next most common name) prefix: C = ambiguity reduced (possibly eliminated) using city match (e.g., H Yang on PMID 24972200) I = ambiguity eliminated by excluding investigators (ie.., one author and one or more investigators with that name) T = ambiguity eliminated using PubMed pos (T for tie-breaker) W = ambiguity resolved by authority2018

This is the first version of the dataset. This dataset contains anonymize data collected during the experiments mentioned in the publication: “I can show what I really like.”: Eliciting Preferences via Quadratic Voting that would appear in April 2021. Once the publication link is public, we would provide an update here. These data were collected through our open-source online systems that are available at (experiment1)[https://github.com/a2975667/QV-app] and (experiment 2)[https://github.com/a2975667/QV-buyback] There are two folders in this dataset. The first folder (exp1_data) contains data collected during experiment 1; the second folder (exp2_data) contains data collected during experiment 2.

An Atlas.ti dataset and accompanying documentation of a thematic analysis of problems and opportunities associated with retracted research and its continued citation.

Author-ity 2018 dataset Prepared by Vetle Torvik Apr. 22, 2021 The dataset is based on a snapshot of PubMed taken in December 2018 (NLMs baseline 2018 plus updates throughout 2018). A total of 29.1 million Article records and 114.2 million author name instances. Each instance of an author name is uniquely represented by the PMID and the position on the paper (e.g., 10786286_3 is the third author name on PMID 10786286). Thus, each cluster is represented by a collection of author name instances. The instances were first grouped into "blocks" by last name and first name initial (including some close variants), and then each block was separately subjected to clustering. The resulting clusters are provided in two different formats, the first in a file with only IDs and PMIDs, and the second in a file with cluster summaries: #################### File 1: au2id2018.tsv #################### Each line corresponds to an author name instance (PMID and Author name position) with an Author ID. It has the following tab-delimited fields: 1. Author ID 2. PMID 3. Author name position ######################## File 2: authority2018.tsv ######################### Each line corresponds to a predicted author-individual represented by cluster of author name instances and a summary of all the corresponding papers and author name variants. Each cluster has a unique Author ID (the PMID of the earliest paper in the cluster and the author name position). The summary has the following tab-delimited fields: 1. Author ID (or cluster ID) e.g., 3797874_1 represents a cluster where 3797874_1 is the earliest author name instance. 2. cluster size (number of author name instances on papers) 3. name variants separated by '|' with counts in parenthesis. Each variant of the format lastname_firstname middleinitial, suffix 4. last name variants separated by '|' 5. first name variants separated by '|' 6. middle initial variants separated by '|' ('-' if none) 7. suffix variants separated by '|' ('-' if none) 8. email addresses separated by '|' ('-' if none) 9. ORCIDs separated by '|' ('-' if none). From 2019 ORCID Public Data File https://orcid.org/ and from PubMed XML 10. range of years (e.g., 1997-2009) 11. Top 20 most frequent affiliation words (after stoplisting and tokenizing; some phrases are also made) with counts in parenthesis; separated by '|'; ('-' if none) 12. Top 20 most frequent MeSH (after stoplisting) with counts in parenthesis; separated by '|'; ('-' if none) 13. Journal names with counts in parenthesis (separated by '|'), 14. Top 20 most frequent title words (after stoplisting and tokenizing) with counts in parenthesis; separated by '|'; ('-' if none) 15. Co-author names (lowercased lastname and first/middle initials) with counts in parenthesis; separated by '|'; ('-' if none) 16. Author name instances (PMID_auno separated by '|') 17. Grant IDs (after normalization; '-' if none given; separated by '|'), 18. Total number of times cited. (Citations are based on references harvested from open sources such as PMC). 19. h-index 20. Citation counts (e.g., for h-index): PMIDs by the author that have been cited (with total citation counts in parenthesis); separated by '|'

To generate the bibliographic and survey data to support a data reuse study conducted by several Library faculty and accepted for publication in the Journal of Academic Librarianship, the project team utilized a series of web-based online scripts that employed several different endpoints from the Scopus API. The related dataset: "Data for: An Examination of Data Reuse Practices within Highly Cited Articles of Faculty at a Research University" contains survey design and results. <br /> 1) <b>getScopus_API_process_dmp_IDB.asp</b>: used the search API query the Scopus database API for papers by UIUC authors published in 2015 -- limited to one of 9 pre-defined Scopus subject areas -- and retrieve metadata results sorted highest to lowest by the number of times the retrieved articles were cited. The URL for the basic searches took the following form: https://api.elsevier.com/content/search/scopus?query=(AFFIL%28(urbana%20OR%20champaign) AND univ*%29) OR (AF-ID(60000745) OR AF-ID(60005290))&apikey=xxxxxx&start=" & nstart & "&count=25&date=2015&view=COMPLETE&sort=citedby-count&subj=PHYS<br /> Here, the variable nstart was incremented by 25 each iteration and 25 records were retrieved in each pass. The subject area was renamed (e.g. from PHYS to COMP for computer science) in each of the 9 runs. This script does not use the Scopus API cursor but downloads 25 records at a time for up to 28 times -- or 675 maximum bibliographic records. The project team felt that looking at the most 675 cited articles from UIUC faculty in each of the 9 subject areas was sufficient to gather a robust, representative sample of articles from 2015. These downloaded records were stored in a temporary table that was renamed for each of the 9 subject areas. <br /> 2) <b>get_citing_from_surveys_IDB.asp</b>: takes a Scopus article ID (eid) from the 49 UIUC author returned surveys and retrieves short citing article references, 200 at a time, into a temporary composite table. These citing records contain only one author, no author affiliations, and no author email addresses. This script uses the Scopus API cursor=* feature and is able to download all the citing references of an article 200 records at a time. <br /> 3) <b>put_in_all_authors_affil_IDB.asp</b>: adds important data to the short citing records. The script adds all co-authors and their affiliations, the corresponding author, and author email addresses. <br /> 4) <b>process_for_final_IDB.asp</b>: creates a relational database table with author, title, and source journal information for each of the citing articles that can be copied as an Excel file for processing by the Qualtrics survey software. This was initially 4,626 citing articles over the 49 UIUC authored articles, but was reduced to 2,041 entries after checking for available email addresses and eliminating duplicates.

Terrorism is among the most pressing challenges to democratic governance around the world. The Responsible Terrorism Coverage (or ResTeCo) project aims to address a fundamental dilemma facing 21st century societies: how to give citizens the information they need without giving terrorists the kind of attention they want. The ResTeCo hopes to inform best practices by using extreme-scale text analytic methods to extract information from more than 70 years of terrorism-related media coverage from around the world and across 5 languages. Our goal is to expand the available data on media responses to terrorism and enable the development of empirically-validated models for socially responsible, effective news organizations. This particular dataset contains information extracted from terrorism-related stories in the Summary of World Broadcasts published between 1979 and 2019. It includes variables that measure the relative share of terrorism-related topics, the valence and intensity of emotional language, as well as the people, places, and organizations mentioned. This dataset contains 3 files: 1. "ResTeCo Project SWB Dataset Variable Descriptions.pdf" A detailed codebook containing a summary of the Responsible Terrorism Coverage (ResTeCo) Project BBC Summary of World Broadcasts (SWB) Dataset and descriptions of all variables. 2. "resteco-swb.csv" This file contains the data extracted from terrorism-related media coverage in the BBC Summary of World Broadcasts (SWB) between 1979 and 2019. It includes variables that measure the relative share of topics, sentiment, and emotion present in this coverage. There are also variables that contain metadata and list the people, places, and organizations mentioned in these articles. There are 53 variables and 438,373 observations. The variable "id" uniquely identifies each observation. Each observation represents a single news article. Please note that care should be taken when using "resteco-swb.csv". The file may not be suitable to use in a spreadsheet program like Excel as some of the values get to be quite large. Excel cannot handle some of these large values, which may cause the data to appear corrupted within the software. It is encouraged that a user of this data use a statistical package such as Stata, R, or Python to ensure the structure and quality of the data remains preserved. 3. "README.md" This file contains useful information for the user about the dataset. It is a text file written in markdown language Citation Guidelines 1) To cite this codebook please use the following citation: Althaus, Scott, Joseph Bajjalieh, Marc Jungblut, Dan Shalmon, Subhankar Ghosh, and Pradnyesh Joshi. 2020. Responsible Terrorism Coverage (ResTeCo) Project BBC Summary of World Broadcasts (SWB) Dataset Variable Descriptions. Responsible Terrorism Coverage (ResTeCo) Project BBC Summary of World Broadcasts (SWB) Dataset. Cline Center for Advanced Social Research. December 16. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. doi: https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-2128492_V1 2) To cite the data please use the following citation: Althaus, Scott, Joseph Bajjalieh, Marc Jungblut, Dan Shalmon, Subhankar Ghosh, and Pradnyesh Joshi. 2020. Responsible Terrorism Coverage (ResTeCo) Project Summary of World Broadcasts (SWB) Dataset. Cline Center for Advanced Social Research. December 16. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. doi: https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-2128492_V1

This dataset contains all the code, notebooks, datasets used in the study conducted to measure the spatial accessibility of COVID-19 healthcare resources with a particular focus on Illinois, USA. Specifically, the dataset measures spatial access for people to hospitals and ICU beds in Illinois. The spatial accessibility is measured by the use of an enhanced two-step floating catchment area (E2FCA) method (Luo & Qi, 2009), which is an outcome of interactions between demands (i.e, # of potential patients; people) and supply (i.e., # of beds or physicians). The result is a map of spatial accessibility to hospital beds. It identifies which regions need more healthcare resources, such as the number of ICU beds and ventilators. This notebook serves as a guideline of which areas need more beds in the fight against COVID-19. ## What's Inside A quick explanation of the components of the zip file * `COVID-19Acc.ipynb` is a notebook for calculating spatial accessibility and `COVID-19Acc.html` is an export of the notebook as HTML. * `Data` contains all of the data necessary for calculations: &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; * `Chicago_Network.graphml`/`Illinois_Network.graphml` are GraphML files of the OSMNX street networks for Chicago and Illinois respectively. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; * `GridFile/` has hexagonal gridfiles for Chicago and Illinois &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; * `HospitalData/` has shapefiles for the hospitals in Chicago and Illinois &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; * `IL_zip_covid19/COVIDZip.json` has JSON file which contains COVID cases by zip code from IDPH &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; * `PopData/` contains population data for Chicago and Illinois by census tract and zip code. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; * `Result/` is where we write out the results of the spatial accessibility measures &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; * `SVI/`contains data about the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) * `img/` contains some images and HTML maps of the hospitals (the notebook generates the maps) * `README.md` is the document you're currently reading! * `requirements.txt` is a list of Python packages necessary to use the notebook (besides Jupyter/IPython). You can install the packages with `python3 -m pip install -r requirements.txt`

Data on Croatian restaurant allergen disclosures on restaurant websites, on-line menus and social media comments

This dataset contains the publication record of 6429 computer science researchers collected from the Microsoft Academic dataset provided through their Knowledge Service API (http://bit.ly/microsoft-data).

This dataset contains R codes used to produce the figures submitted in the manuscript titled "Understanding the multifaceted geospatial software ecosystem: a survey approach". The raw survey data used to populate these charts cannot be shared due to the survey consent agreement.

These data and code enable replication of the findings and robustness checks in "No buzz for bees: Media coverage of pollinator decline," published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2020)". In this paper, we find that although widespread declines in insect biomass and diversity are increasing concern within the scientific community, it remains unclear whether attention to pollinator declines has also increased within information sources serving the general public. Examining patterns of journalistic attention to the pollinator population crisis can also inform efforts to raise awareness about the importance of declines of insect species providing ecosystem services beyond pollination. We used the Global News Index developed by the Cline Center for Advanced Social Research at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign to track news attention to pollinator topics in nearly 25 million news items published by two American national newspapers and four international wire services over the past four decades. We provide a link to documentation of the Global News Index in the "relationships with articles, code, o. We found vanishingly low levels of attention to pollinator population topics relative to coverage of climate change, which we use as a comparison topic. In the most recent subset of ~10 million stories published from 2007 to 2019, 1.39% (137,086 stories) refer to climate change/global warming, while only 0.02% (1,780) refer to pollinator populations in all contexts and just 0.007% (679) refer to pollinator declines. Substantial increases in news attention were detectable only in U.S. national newspapers. We also find that while climate change stories appear primarily in newspaper “front sections”, pollinator population stories remain largely marginalized in “science” and “back section” reports. At the same time, news reports about pollinator populations increasingly link the issue to climate change, which might ultimately help raise public awareness to effect needed policy changes.

These are text files downloaded from the Web of Science for the bibliographic analyses found in Zinnen et al. (2020) in Applied Vegetation Science. They represent the papers and reference lists from six expert-based indicator systems: Floristic Quality Assessment, hemeroby, naturalness indicator values (& social behaviors), Ellenberg indicator values, grassland utilization values, and urbanity indicator values. To examine data, download VOSviewer and see instructrions from van Eck & Waltman (2019) for how to upload data. Although we used bibliographic coupling, there are a number of other interesting bibliographic analyses you can use with these data (e.g., visualizing citations between journals from this set of documents). Note: There are two caveats to note about these data and Supplements 1 & 2 associated with our paper. First, there are some overlapping papers in these text files (i.e., raw data). When added individually, the papers sum to more than the numbers we give. However, when combined VOSviewer recognizes these as repeats, and matches the numbers we list in S1 and the manuscript. Second, we labelled the downloaded papers in S2 with their respective systems. In some cases, the labels do not completely match our counts listed in S1 and raw data. This is because some of these papers use another system, but were not captured in our systematic literature search (e.g., a paper may have used hemeroby, but was not picked up by WoS, so this paper is not listed as one of the 52 hemeroby papers).

Dataset to be for SocialMediaIE tutorial

This dataset include data pulled from the World Bank 2009, the World Values Survey wave 6, Transparency International from 2009. The data were used to measure perceptions of expertise from individuals in nations that are recipients of development aid as measured by the World Bank.

This is a network of 14 systematic reviews on the salt controversy and their included studies. Each edge in the network represents an inclusion from one systematic review to an article. Systematic reviews were collected from Trinquart (Trinquart, L., Johns, D. M., & Galea, S. (2016). Why do we think we know what we know? A metaknowledge analysis of the salt controversy. International Journal of Epidemiology, 45(1), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyv184 ). <b>FILE FORMATS</b> 1) Article_list.csv - Unicode CSV 2) Article_attr.csv - Unicode CSV 3) inclusion_net_edges.csv - Unicode CSV 4) potential_inclusion_link.csv - Unicode CSV 5) systematic_review_inclusion_criteria.csv - Unicode CSV 6) Supplementary Reference List.pdf - PDF <b>ROW EXPLANATIONS</b> 1) Article_list.csv - Each row describes a systematic review or included article. 2) Article_attr.csv - Each row is the attributes of a systematic review/included article. 3) inclusion_net_edges.csv - Each row represents an inclusion from a systematic review to an article. 4) potential_inclusion_link.csv - Each row shows the available evidence base of a systematic review. 5) systematic_review_inclusion_criteria.csv - Each row is the inclusion criteria of a systematic review. 6) Supplementary Reference List.pdf - Each item is a bibliographic record of a systematic review/included paper. <b>COLUMN HEADER EXPLANATIONS</b> <b>1) Article_list.csv:</b> ID - Numeric ID of a paper paper assigned ID - ID of the paper from Trinquart et al. (2016) Type - Systematic review / primary study report Study Groupings - Groupings for related primary study reports from the same report, from Trinquart et al. (2016) (if applicable, otherwise blank) Title - Title of the paper year - Publication year of the paper Attitude - Scientific opinion about the salt controversy from Trinquart et al. (2016) Doi - DOIs of the paper. (if applicable, otherwise blank) Retracted (Y/N) - Whether the paper was retracted or withdrawn (Y). Blank if not retracted or withdrawn. <b>2) Article_attr.csv:</b> ID - Numeric ID of a paper year - Publication year Attitude - Scientific opinion about the salt controversy from Trinquart et al. (2016) Type - Systematic review/ primary study report <b>3) inclusion_net_edges.csv:</b> citing_ID - The numeric ID of a systematic review cited_ID - The numeric ID of the included articles <b>4) potential_inclusion_link.csv:</b> This data was translated from the Sankey diagram given in Trinquart et al. (2016) as Web Figure 4. Each row indicates a systematic review and each column indicates a primary study. In the matrix, "p" indicates that a given primary study had been published as of the search date of a given systematic review. <b>5)systematic_review_inclusion_criteria.csv:</b> ID - The numeric IDs of systematic reviews paper assigned ID - ID of the paper from Trinquart et al. (2016) attitude - Its scientific opinion about the salt controversy from Trinquart et al. (2016) No. of studies included - Number of articles included in the systematic review Study design - Study designs to include, per inclusion criteria population - Populations to include, per inclusion criteria Exposure/Intervention - Exposures/Interventions to include, per inclusion criteria outcome - Study outcomes required for inclusion, per inclusion criteria Language restriction - Report languages to include, per inclusion criteria follow-up period - Follow-up period required for inclusion, per inclusion criteria

This dataset is a snapshot of the presence and structure of entrepreneurship education in U.S. four-year colleges and universities in 2015, including co-curricular activities and related infrastructure. Public, private not-for-profit and for-profit institutions are included, as are specialized four-year institutions. The dataset provides insight into the presence of entrepreneurship education both within business units and in other units of college campuses. Entrepreneurship is defined broadly, to include small business management and related career-focused options.

Trained models for multi-task multi-dataset learning for sequence prediction in tweets Tasks include POS, NER, Chunking, and SuperSenseTagging Models were trained using: https://github.com/napsternxg/SocialMediaIE/blob/master/experiments/multitask_multidataset_experiment.py See https://github.com/napsternxg/SocialMediaIE for details.

This data has tweets collected in paper Shubhanshu Mishra, Sneha Agarwal, Jinlong Guo, Kirstin Phelps, Johna Picco, and Jana Diesner. 2014. Enthusiasm and support: alternative sentiment classification for social movements on social media. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM conference on Web science (WebSci '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 261-262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2615569.2615667 The data only contains tweet IDs and the corresponding enthusiasm and support labels by two different annotators.

Terrorism is among the most pressing challenges to democratic governance around the world. The Responsible Terrorism Coverage (or ResTeCo) project aims to address a fundamental dilemma facing 21st century societies: how to give citizens the information they need without giving terrorists the kind of attention they want. The ResTeCo hopes to inform best practices by using extreme-scale text analytic methods to extract information from more than 70 years of terrorism-related media coverage from around the world and across 5 languages. Our goal is to expand the available data on media responses to terrorism and enable the development of empirically-validated models for socially responsible, effective news organizations. This particular dataset contains information extracted from terrorism-related stories in the New York Times published between 1945 and 2018. It includes variables that measure the relative share of terrorism-related topics, the valence and intensity of emotional language, as well as the people, places, and organizations mentioned. This dataset contains 3 files: 1. <i>"ResTeCo Project NYT Dataset Variable Descriptions.pdf"</i> <ul> <li>A detailed codebook containing a summary of the Responsible Terrorism Coverage (ResTeCo) Project New York Times (NYT) Dataset and descriptions of all variables. </li> </ul> 2. <i>"resteco-nyt.csv"</i> <ul><li>This file contains the data extracted from terrorism-related media coverage in the New York Times between 1945 and 2018. It includes variables that measure the relative share of topics, sentiment, and emotion present in this coverage. There are also variables that contain metadata and list the people, places, and organizations mentioned in these articles. There are 53 variables and 438,373 observations. The variable "id" uniquely identifies each observation. Each observation represents a single news article. </li> <li> <b>Please note</b> that care should be taken when using "respect-nyt.csv". The file may not be suitable to use in a spreadsheet program like Excel as some of the values get to be quite large. Excel cannot handle some of these large values, which may cause the data to appear corrupted within the software. It is encouraged that a user of this data use a statistical package such as Stata, R, or Python to ensure the structure and quality of the data remains preserved.</li> </ul> 3. <i>"README.md"</i> <ul><li>This file contains useful information for the user about the dataset. It is a text file written in mark down language</li> </ul> <b>Citation Guidelines</b> 1) To cite this codebook please use the following citation: Althaus, Scott, Joseph Bajjalieh, Marc Jungblut, Dan Shalmon, Subhankar Ghosh, and Pradnyesh Joshi. 2020. Responsible Terrorism Coverage (ResTeCo) Project New York Times (NYT) Dataset Variable Descriptions. Responsible Terrorism Coverage (ResTeCo) Project New York Times Dataset. Cline Center for Advanced Social Research. May 13. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. doi: 10.13012/B2IDB-4638196_V1 2) To cite the data please use the following citation: Althaus, Scott, Joseph Bajjalieh, Marc Jungblut, Dan Shalmon, Subhankar Ghosh, and Pradnyesh Joshi. 2020. Responsible Terrorism Coverage (ResTeCo) Project New York Times Dataset. Cline Center for Advanced Social Research. May 13. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. doi: 10.13012/B2IDB-4638196_V1

This dataset inventories the availability of entrepreneurship and small business education, including co-curricular opportunities, in two-year colleges in the United States. The inventory provides a snapshot of activities at more than 1,650 public, not-for-profit, and private for-profit institutions, in 2014.

Citation context annotation for papers citing retracted paper Matsuyama 2005 (RETRACTED: Matsuyama W, Mitsuyama H, Watanabe M, Oonakahara KI, Higashimoto I, Osame M, Arimura K. Effects of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on inflammatory markers in COPD. Chest. 2005 Dec 1;128(6):3817-27.), retracted in 2008 (Retraction in: Chest (2008) 134:4 (893) <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-3692(08)60339-6">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-3692(08)60339-6<a/> ). This is part of the supplemental data for Jodi Schneider, Di Ye, Alison Hill, and Ashley Whitehorn. "Continued Citation of a Fraudulent Clinical Trial Report, Eleven Years after it was retracted for Falsifying Data" [R&R under review with Scientometrics]. Overall we found 148 citations to the retracted paper from 2006 to 2019, However, this dataset does not include the annotations described in the 2015. in Ashley Fulton, Alison Coates, Marie Williams, Peter Howe, and Alison Hill. "Persistent citation of the only published randomized controlled trial of omega-3 supplementation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease six years after its retraction." Publications 3, no. 1 (2015): 17-26. In this dataset 70 new and newly found citations are listed: 66 annotated citations and 4 pending citations (non-annotated since we don't have full-text). "New citations" refer to articles published from March 25, 2014 to 2019, found in Google Scholar and Web of Science. "Newly found citations" refer articles published 2006-2013, found in Google Scholar and Web of Science, but not previously covered in Ashley Fulton, Alison Coates, Marie Williams, Peter Howe, and Alison Hill. "Persistent citation of the only published randomised controlled trial of omega-3 supplementation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease six years after its retraction." Publications 3, no. 1 (2015): 17-26. NOTES: This is Unicode data. Some publication titles & quotes are in non-Latin characters and they may contain commas, quotation marks, etc. FILES/FILE FORMATS Same data in two formats: 2006-2019-new-citation-contexts-to-Matsuyama.csv - Unicode CSV (preservation format only) 2006-2019-new-citation-contexts-to-Matsuyama.xlsx - Excel workbook (preferred format) ROW EXPLANATIONS 70 rows of data - one citing publication per row COLUMN HEADER EXPLANATIONS Note - processing notes Annotation pending - Y or blank Year Published - publication year ID - ID corresponding to the network analysis. See Ye, Di; Schneider, Jodi (2019): Network of First and Second-generation citations to Matsuyama 2005 from Google Scholar and Web of Science. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. <a href="https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-1403534_V2">https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-1403534_V2</a> Title - item title (some have non-Latin characters, commas, etc.) Official Translated Title - item title in English, as listed in the publication Machine Translated Title - item title in English, translated by Google Scholar Language - publication language Type - publication type (e.g., bachelor's thesis, blog post, book chapter, clinical guidelines, Cochrane Review, consumer-oriented evidence summary, continuing education journal article, journal article, letter to the editor, magazine article, Master's thesis, patent, Ph.D. thesis, textbook chapter, training module) Book title for book chapters - Only for a book chapter - the book title University for theses - for bachelor's thesis, Master's thesis, Ph.D. thesis - the associated university Pre/Post Retraction - "Pre" for 2006-2008 (means published before the October 2008 retraction notice or in the 2 months afterwards); "Post" for 2009-2019 (considered post-retraction for our analysis) Identifier where relevant - ISBN, Patent ID, PMID (only for items we considered hard to find/identify, e.g. those without a DOI-based URL) URL where available - URL, ideally a DOI-based URL Reference number/style - reference Only in bibliography - Y or blank Acknowledged - If annotated, Y, Not relevant as retraction not published yet, or N (blank otherwise) Positive / "Poor Research" (Negative) - P for positive, N for negative if annotated; blank otherwise Human translated quotations - Y or blank; blank means Google scholar was used to translate quotations for Translated Quotation X Specific/in passing (overall) - Specific if any of the 5 quotations are specific [aggregates Specific / In Passing (Quotation X)] Quotation 1 - First quotation (or blank) (includes non-Latin characters in some cases) Translated Quotation 1 - English translation of "Quotation 1" (or blank) Specific / In Passing (Quotation 1) - Specific if "Quotation 1" refers to methods or results of the Matsuyama paper (or blank) What is referenced from Matsuyama (Quotation 1) - Methods; Results; or Methods and Results - blank if "Quotation 1" not specific, no associated quotation, or not yet annotated Quotation 2 - Second quotation (includes non-Latin characters in some cases) Translated Quotation 2 - English translation of "Quotation 2" Specific / In Passing (Quotation 2) - Specific if "Quotation 2" refers to methods or results of the Matsuyama paper (or blank) What is referenced from Matsuyama (Quotation 2) - Methods; Results; or Methods and Results - blank if "Quotation 2" not specific, no associated quotation, or not yet annotated Quotation 3 - Third quotation (includes non-Latin characters in some cases) Translated Quotation 3 - English translation of "Quotation 3" Specific / In Passing (Quotation 3) - Specific if "Quotation 3" refers to methods or results of the Matsuyama paper (or blank) What is referenced from Matsuyama (Quotation 3) - Methods; Results; or Methods and Results - blank if "Quotation 3" not specific, no associated quotation, or not yet annotated Quotation 4 - Fourth quotation (includes non-Latin characters in some cases) Translated Quotation 4 - English translation of "Quotation 4" Specific / In Passing (Quotation 4) - Specific if "Quotation 4" refers to methods or results of the Matsuyama paper (or blank) What is referenced from Matsuyama (Quotation 4) - Methods; Results; or Methods and Results - blank if "Quotation 4" not specific, no associated quotation, or not yet annotated Quotation 5 - Fifth quotation (includes non-Latin characters in some cases) Translated Quotation 5 - English translation of "Quotation 5" Specific / In Passing (Quotation 5) - Specific if "Quotation 5" refers to methods or results of the Matsuyama paper (or blank) What is referenced from Matsuyama (Quotation 5) - Methods; Results; or Methods and Results - blank if "Quotation 5" not specific, no associated quotation, or not yet annotated Further Notes - additional notes

This dataset contains the results of a three month audit of housing advertisements. It accompanies the 2020 ICWSM paper "Auditing Race and Gender Discrimination in Online Housing Markets". It covers data collected between Dec 7, 2018 and March 19, 2019. There are two json files in the dataset: The first contains a list of json objects representing advertisements separated by newlines. Each object includes the date and time it was collected, the image and title (if collected) of the ad, the page on which it was displayed, and the training treatment it received. The second file is a list of json objects representing a visit to a housing lister separated by newlines. Each object contains the url, training treatment applied, the location searched, and the metadata of the top sites scraped. This metadata includes location, price, and number of rooms. The dataset also includes the raw images of ads collected in order to code them by interest and targeting. These were captured by selenium and named using a perceptive hash to de-duplicate images.