Dataset Search Results

The Cline Center Global News Index is a searchable database of textual features extracted from millions of news stories, specifically designed to provide comprehensive coverage of events around the world. In addition to searching documents for keywords, users can query metadata and features such as named entities extracted using Natural Language Processing (NLP) methods and variables that measure sentiment and emotional valence. Archer is a web application purpose-built by the Cline Center to enable researchers to access data from the Global News Index. Archer provides a user-friendly interface for querying the Global News Index (with the back-end indexing still handled by Solr). By default, queries are built using icons and drop-down menus. More technically-savvy users can use Lucene/Solr query syntax via a ‘raw query’ option. Archer allows users to save and iterate on their queries, and to visualize faceted query results, which can be helpful for users as they refine their queries. Additional Resources: - Access to Archer and the Global News Index is limited to account-holders. If you are interested in signing up for an account, please fill out the <a href="https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf-J937V6I4sMSxQt7gR3SIbUASR26KXxqSurrkBvlF-CIQnQ/viewform?usp=pp_url"><b>Archer Access Request Form</b></a> so we can determine if you are eligible for access or not. - Current users who would like to provide feedback, such as reporting a bug or requesting a feature, can fill out the <a href="https://forms.gle/6eA2yJUGFMtj5swY7"><b>Archer User Feedback Form</b></a>. - The Cline Center sends out periodic email newsletters to the Archer Users Group. Please fill out this <a href="https://groups.webservices.illinois.edu/subscribe/154221"><b>form</b></a> to subscribe to it. <b>Citation Guidelines:</b> 1) To cite the GNI codebook (or any other documentation associated with the Global News Index and Archer) please use the following citation: Cline Center for Advanced Social Research. 2025. Global News Index and Extracted Features Repository [codebook], v1.3.0. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois. June. XX. doi:10.13012/B2IDB-5649852_V6 2) To cite data from the Global News Index (accessed via Archer or otherwise) please use the following citation (filling in the correct date of access): Cline Center for Advanced Social Research. 2025. Global News Index and Extracted Features Repository [database], v1.3.0. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois. Jun. XX. Accessed Month, DD, YYYY. doi:10.13012/B2IDB-5649852_V6 *NOTE: V6 is replacing V5 with updated ‘Archer’ documents to reflect changes made to the Archer system.

Hype - PubMed dataset Prepared by Apratim Mishra This dataset captures ‘Hype’ within biomedical abstracts sourced from PubMed. The selection chosen is ‘journal articles’ written in English, published between 1975 and 2019, totaling ~5.2 million. The classification relies on the presence of specific candidate ‘hype words’ and their abstract location. Therefore, each article (PMID) might have multiple instances in the dataset due to the presence of multiple hype words in different abstract sentences. The candidate hype words are 35 in count: 'major', 'novel', 'central', 'critical', 'essential', 'strongly', 'unique', 'promising', 'markedly', 'excellent', 'crucial', 'robust', 'importantly', 'prominent', 'dramatically', 'favorable', 'vital', 'surprisingly', 'remarkably', 'remarkable', 'definitive', 'pivotal', 'innovative', 'supportive', 'encouraging', 'unprecedented', 'enormous', 'exceptional', 'outstanding', 'noteworthy', 'creative', 'assuring', 'reassuring', 'spectacular', and 'hopeful’. This is version 3 of the dataset. Added new file - WSD_hype.tsv File 1: hype_dataset_final.tsv Primary dataset. It has the following columns: 1. PMID: represents unique article ID in PubMed 2. Year: Year of publication 3. Hype_word: Candidate hype word, such as ‘novel.’ 4. Sentence: Sentence in abstract containing the hype word. 5. Hype_percentile: Abstract relative position of hype word. 6. Hype_value: Propensity of hype based on the hype word, the sentence, and the abstract location. 7. Introduction: The ‘I’ component of the hype word based on IMRaD 8. Methods: The ‘M’ component of the hype word based on IMRaD 9. Results: The ‘R’ component of the hype word based on IMRaD 10. Discussion: The ‘D’ component of the hype word based on IMRaD File 2: hype_removed_phrases_final.tsv Secondary dataset with same columns as File 1. Hype in the primary dataset is based on excluding certain phrases that are rarely hype. The phrases that were removed are included in File 2 and modeled separately. Removed phrases: 1. Major: histocompatibility, component, protein, metabolite, complex, surgery 2. Novel: assay, mutation, antagonist, inhibitor, algorithm, technique, series, method, hybrid 3. Central: catheters, system, design, composite, catheter, pressure, thickness, compartment 4. Critical: compartment, micelle, temperature, incident, solution, ischemia, concentration, thinking, nurses, skills, analysis, review, appraisal, evaluation, values 5. Essential: medium, features, properties, opportunities, oil 6. Unique: model, amino 7. Robust: regression 8. Vital: capacity, signs, organs, status, structures, staining, rates, cells, information 9. Outstanding: questions, issues, question, questions, challenge, problems, problem, remains 10. Remarkable: properties 11. Definite: radiotherapy, surgery File 3: WSD_hype.tsv Includes hype-based disambiguation for candidate words targeted for WSD (Word sense disambiguation)

This dataset builds on an existing dataset which captures artists’ demographics who are represented by top tier galleries in the 2016–2017 New York art season (Case-Leal, 2017, https://web.archive.org/web/20170617002654/http://www.havenforthedispossessed.org/) with a census of reviews and catalogs about those exhibitions to assess proportionality of media coverage across race and gender. The readme file explains variables, collection, relationship between the datasets, and an example of how the Case-Leal dataset was transformed. The ArticleDataset.csv provides all articles with citation information as well as artist, artistic identity characteristic, and gallery. The ExhibitionCatalog.csv provides exhibition catalog citation information for each identified artist.

To gather news articles from the web that discuss the Cochrane Review (DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6), we retrieved articles on August 1, 2023 from used Altmetric.com's Altmetric Explorer. We selected all articles that were written in English, published in the United States, and had a publication date <b>on or after March 10, 2023</b> (according to the "Mention Date" from Altmetric.com). This date is significant as it is when Cochrane issued a statement (https://www.cochrane.org/news/statement-physical-interventions-interrupt-or-reduce-spread-respiratory-viruses-review) about the "misleading interpretation" of the Cochrane Review made by news articles. A previously published dataset for "Arguing about Controversial Science in the News: Does Epistemic Uncertainty Contribute to Information Disorder?" (DOI: 10.13012/B2IDB-4781172_V1) contains annotation of the news articles published before March 10, 2023. Our dataset annotates the news published on or after March 10, 2023. The Altmetric_data.csv describes the selected news articles with both data exported from Altmetric Explorer and data we manually added Data exported from Altmetric Explorer: - Publication date of the news article - Title of the news article - Source/publication venue of the news article - URL - Country Data we manually added: - Whether the article is accessible - The date we checked the article - The corresponding ID of the article in MAXQDA For each article from Altmetric.com, we first tried to use the Web Collector for MAXQDA to download the article from the website and imported it into MAXQDA (version 22.8.0). We manually extracted direct quotations from the articles using MAXQDA. We included surrounding words and sentences around direct quotations for context where needed. We manually added codes and code categories in MAXQDA to identify the individuals (chief editors of the Cochrane Review, government agency representatives, journalists, and other experts such as physicians) or organizations (government agencies, other organizations, and research publications) who were quoted. The MAXQDA_data.csv file contains excerpts from the news articles that contain the direct quotations we annotated. For each excerpt, we included the following information: - MAXQDA ID of the document from which the excerpt originates - The collection date and source of the document - The code we assigned to the excerpt - The code category - The excerpt itself

To gather news articles from the web that discuss the Cochrane Review, we used Altmetric Explorer from Altmetric.com and retrieved articles on August 1, 2023. We selected all articles that were written in English, published in the United States, and had a publication date <b>prior to March 10, 2023</b> (according to the “Mention Date” on Altmetric.com). This date is significant as it is when Cochrane issued a statement about the "misleading interpretation" of the Cochrane Review. The collection of news articles is presented in the Altmetric_data.csv file. The dataset contains the following data that we exported from Altmetric Explorer: - Publication date of the news article - Title of the news article - Source/publication venue of the news article - URL - Country We manually checked and added the following information: - Whether the article still exists - Whether the article is accessible - Whether the article is from the original source We assigned MAXQDA IDs to the news articles. News articles were assigned the same ID when they were (a) identical or (b) in the case of Article 207, closely paraphrased, paragraph by paragraph. Inaccessible items were assigned a MAXQDA ID based on their "Mention Title". For each article from Altmetric.com, we first tried to use the Web Collector for MAXQDA to download the article from the website and imported it into MAXQDA (version 22.7.0). If an article could not be retrieved using the Web Collector, we either downloaded the .html file or in the case of Article 128, retrieved it from the NewsBank database through the University of Illinois Library. We then manually extracted direct quotations from the articles using MAXQDA. We included surrounding words and sentences, and in one case, a news agency’s commentary, around direct quotations for context where needed. The quotations (with context) are the positions in our analysis. We also identified who was quoted. We excluded quotations when we could not identify who or what was being quoted. We annotated quotations with codes representing groups (government agencies, other organizations, and research publications) and individuals (authors of the Cochrane Review, government agency representatives, journalists, and other experts such as epidemiologists). The MAXQDA_data.csv file contains excerpts from the news articles that contain the direct quotations we identified. For each excerpt, we included the following information: - MAXQDA ID of the document from which the excerpt originates; - The collection date and source of the document; - The code with which the excerpt is annotated; - The code category; - The excerpt itself.

Prepared by Vetle Torvik 2021-05-07 The dataset comes as a single tab-delimited Latin-1 encoded file (only the City column uses non-ASCII characters). • How was the dataset created? The dataset is based on a snapshot of PubMed (which includes Medline and PubMed-not-Medline records) taken in December, 2018. (NLMs baseline 2018 plus updates throughout 2018). Affiliations are linked to a particular author on a particular article. Prior to 2014, NLM recorded the affiliation of the first author only. However, MapAffil 2018 covers some PubMed records lacking affiliations that were harvested elsewhere, from PMC (e.g., PMID 22427989), NIH grants (e.g., 1838378), and Microsoft Academic Graph and ADS (e.g. 5833220). Affiliations are pre-processed (e.g., transliterated into ASCII from UTF-8 and html) so they may differ (sometimes a lot; see PMID 27487542) from PubMed records. All affiliation strings where processed using the MapAffil procedure, to identify and disambiguate the most specific place-name, as described in: Torvik VI. MapAffil: A bibliographic tool for mapping author affiliation strings to cities and their geocodes worldwide. D-Lib Magazine 2015; 21 (11/12). 10p • Look for Fig. 4 in the following article for coverage statistics over time: Palmblad, M., Torvik, V.I. Spatiotemporal analysis of tropical disease research combining Europe PMC and affiliation mapping web services. Trop Med Health 45, 33 (2017). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-017-0073-6">https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-017-0073-6</a> Expect to see big upticks in coverage of PMIDs around 1988 and for non-first authors in 2014. • The code and back-end data is periodically updated and made available for query by PMID at http://abel.ischool.illinois.edu/cgi-bin/mapaffil/search.py • What is the format of the dataset? The dataset contains 52,931,957 rows (plus a header row). Each row (line) in the file has a unique PMID and author order, and contains the following eighteen columns, tab-delimited. All columns are ASCII, except city which contains Latin-1. 1. PMID: positive non-zero integer; int(10) unsigned 2. au_order: positive non-zero integer; smallint(4) 3. lastname: varchar(80) 4. firstname: varchar(80); NLM started including these in 2002 but many have been harvested from outside PubMed 5. initial_2: middle name initial 6. orcid: From 2019 ORCID Public Data File https://orcid.org/ and from PubMed XML 7. year: year of the publication 8. journal: name of journal that the publication is published 9. affiliation: author's affiliation?? 10. disciplines: extracted from departments, divisions, schools, laboratories, centers, etc. that occur on at least unique 100 affiliations across the dataset, some with standardization (e.g., 1770799), English translations (e.g., 2314876), or spelling corrections (e.g., 1291843) 11. grid: inferred using a high-recall technique focused on educational institutions (but, for experimental purposes, includes a few select hospitals, national institutes/centers, international companies, governmental agencies, and 200+ other IDs [RINGGOLD, Wikidata, ISNI, VIAF, http] for institutions not in GRID). Based on 2019 GRID version https://www.grid.ac/ 12. type: EDU, HOS, EDU-HOS, ORG, COM, GOV, MIL, UNK 13. city: varchar(200); typically 'city, state, country' but could include further subdivisions; unresolved ambiguities are concatenated by '|' 14. state: Australia, Canada and USA (which includes territories like PR, GU, AS, and post-codes like AE and AA) 15. country 16. lat: at most 3 decimals (only available when city is not a country or state) 17. lon: at most 3 decimals (only available when city is not a country or state) 18. fips: varchar(5); for USA only retrieved by lat-lon query to https://geo.fcc.gov/api/census/block/find

Author-ity 2018 dataset Prepared by Vetle Torvik Apr. 22, 2021 The dataset is based on a snapshot of PubMed taken in December 2018 (NLMs baseline 2018 plus updates throughout 2018). A total of 29.1 million Article records and 114.2 million author name instances. Each instance of an author name is uniquely represented by the PMID and the position on the paper (e.g., 10786286_3 is the third author name on PMID 10786286). Thus, each cluster is represented by a collection of author name instances. The instances were first grouped into "blocks" by last name and first name initial (including some close variants), and then each block was separately subjected to clustering. The resulting clusters are provided in two different formats, the first in a file with only IDs and PMIDs, and the second in a file with cluster summaries: #################### File 1: au2id2018.tsv #################### Each line corresponds to an author name instance (PMID and Author name position) with an Author ID. It has the following tab-delimited fields: 1. Author ID 2. PMID 3. Author name position ######################## File 2: authority2018.tsv ######################### Each line corresponds to a predicted author-individual represented by cluster of author name instances and a summary of all the corresponding papers and author name variants. Each cluster has a unique Author ID (the PMID of the earliest paper in the cluster and the author name position). The summary has the following tab-delimited fields: 1. Author ID (or cluster ID) e.g., 3797874_1 represents a cluster where 3797874_1 is the earliest author name instance. 2. cluster size (number of author name instances on papers) 3. name variants separated by '|' with counts in parenthesis. Each variant of the format lastname_firstname middleinitial, suffix 4. last name variants separated by '|' 5. first name variants separated by '|' 6. middle initial variants separated by '|' ('-' if none) 7. suffix variants separated by '|' ('-' if none) 8. email addresses separated by '|' ('-' if none) 9. ORCIDs separated by '|' ('-' if none). From 2019 ORCID Public Data File https://orcid.org/ and from PubMed XML 10. range of years (e.g., 1997-2009) 11. Top 20 most frequent affiliation words (after stoplisting and tokenizing; some phrases are also made) with counts in parenthesis; separated by '|'; ('-' if none) 12. Top 20 most frequent MeSH (after stoplisting) with counts in parenthesis; separated by '|'; ('-' if none) 13. Journal names with counts in parenthesis (separated by '|'), 14. Top 20 most frequent title words (after stoplisting and tokenizing) with counts in parenthesis; separated by '|'; ('-' if none) 15. Co-author names (lowercased lastname and first/middle initials) with counts in parenthesis; separated by '|'; ('-' if none) 16. Author name instances (PMID_auno separated by '|') 17. Grant IDs (after normalization; '-' if none given; separated by '|'), 18. Total number of times cited. (Citations are based on references harvested from open sources such as PMC). 19. h-index 20. Citation counts (e.g., for h-index): PMIDs by the author that have been cited (with total citation counts in parenthesis); separated by '|'

Diversity - PubMed dataset Contact: Apratim Mishra (Oct, 2024) This dataset presents article-level (pmid) and author-level (auid) diversity data for PubMed articles. The chosen selection includes articles retrieved from Authority 2018 [1], 907 024 papers, and 1 316 838 authors, and is an expanded dataset of V1. The sample of articles consists of the top 40 journals in the dataset, limited to 2-12 authors published between 1991 – 2014, which are article type "journal type" written in English. Files are 'gzip' compressed and separated by tab space, and V3 includes the correct author count for the included papers (pmids) and updated results with no NaNs. ################################################ File1: auids_plos_3.csv.gz (Important columns defined, 5 in total) • AUID: a unique ID for each author • Genni: gender prediction • Ethnea: ethnicity prediction ################################################# File2: pmids_plos_3.csv.gz (Important columns defined) • pmid: unique paper • auid: all unique auids (author-name unique identification) • year: Year of paper publication • no_authors: Author count • journal: Journal name • years: first year of publication for every author • Country-temporal: Country of affiliation for every author • h_index: Journal h-index • TimeNovelty: Paper Time novelty [2] • nih_funded: Binary variable indicating funding for any author • prior_cit_mean: Mean of all authors’ prior citation rate • Insti_impact: All unique institutions’ citation rate • mesh_vals: Top MeSH values for every author of that paper • relative_citation_ratio: RCR The ‘Readme’ includes a description for all columns. [1] Torvik, Vetle; Smalheiser, Neil (2021): Author-ity 2018 - PubMed author name disambiguated dataset. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-2273402_V1 [2] Mishra, Shubhanshu; Torvik, Vetle I. (2018): Conceptual novelty scores for PubMed articles. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-5060298_V1

Coups d'Ètat are important events in the life of a country. They constitute an important subset of irregular transfers of political power that can have significant and enduring consequences for national well-being. There are only a limited number of datasets available to study these events (Powell and Thyne 2011, Marshall and Marshall 2019). Seeking to facilitate research on post-WWII coups by compiling a more comprehensive list and categorization of these events, the Cline Center for Advanced Social Research (previously the Cline Center for Democracy) initiated the Coup d’État Project as part of its Societal Infrastructures and Development (SID) project. More specifically, this dataset identifies the outcomes of coup events (i.e., realized, unrealized, or conspiracy) the type of actor(s) who initiated the coup (i.e., military, rebels, etc.), as well as the fate of the deposed leader. Version 2.2.0 adds 94 additional coup events. 66 of these came from examining Powell and Thyne’s “discarded” events and 28 of these events were added to the data set in the normal annual review of potential new coup events. This version also updates the coding to events in Brazil in 1945 and the Congo in 1968. Version 2.1.3 adds 19 additional coup events to the data set, corrects the date of a coup in Tunisia, and reclassifies an attempted coup in Brazil in December 2022 as a conspiracy. Version 2.1.2 added 6 additional coup events that occurred in 2022 and updated the coding of an attempted coup event in Kazakhstan in January 2022. Version 2.1.1 corrected a mistake in version 2.1.0, where the designation of “dissident coup” had been dropped in error for coup_id: 00201062021. Version 2.1.1 fixed this omission by marking the case as both a dissident coup and an auto-coup. Version 2.1.0 added 36 cases to the data set and removed two cases from the v2.0.0 data. This update also added actor coding for 46 coup events and added executive outcomes to 18 events from version 2.0.0. A few other changes were made to correct inconsistencies in the coup ID variable and the date of the event. Version 2.0.0 improved several aspects of the previous version (v1.0.0) and incorporated additional source material to include: • Reconciling missing event data • Removing events with irreconcilable event dates • Removing events with insufficient sourcing (each event needs at least two sources) • Removing events that were inaccurately coded as coup events • Removing variables that fell below the threshold of inter-coder reliability required by the project • Removing the spreadsheet ‘CoupInventory.xls’ because of inadequate attribution and citations in the event summaries • Extending the period covered from 1945-2005 to 1945-2019 • Adding events from Powell and Thyne’s Coup Data (Powell and Thyne, 2011) Version 1.0.0 was released in 2013. This version consolidated coup data taken from the following sources: • The Center for Systemic Peace (Marshall and Marshall, 2007) • The World Handbook of Political and Social Indicators (Taylor and Jodice, 1983) • Coup d’Ètat: A Practical Handbook (Luttwak, 1979) • The Cline Center’s Social, Political and Economic Event Database (SPEED) Project (Nardulli, Althaus and Hayes, 2015) • Government Change in Authoritarian Regimes – 2010 Update (Svolik and Akcinaroglu, 2006) <br> <b>Items in this Dataset</b> 1. <i>Cline Center Coup d'État Codebook v.2.2.0 Codebook.pdf</i> - This 17-page document describes the Cline Center Coup d’État Project dataset. The first section of this codebook provides a summary of the different versions of the data. The second section provides a succinct definition of a coup d’état used by the Coup d'État Project and an overview of the categories used to differentiate the wide array of events that meet the project's definition. It also defines coup outcomes. The third section describes the methodology used to produce the data. <i>Revised January 2025</i> 2. <i>Coup Data v2.2.0.csv</i> - This CSV (Comma Separated Values) file contains all of the coup event data from the Cline Center Coup d’État Project. It contains 29 variables and 1094 observations. <i>Revised January 2025</i> 3. <i>Source Document v2.2.0.pdf</i> - This 347-page document provides the sources used for each of the coup events identified in this dataset. Please use the value in the coup_id variable to identify the sources used to identify that particular event. <i>Revised January 2025</i> 4. <i>README.md</i> - This file contains useful information for the user about the dataset. It is a text file written in markdown language. <i>Revised January 2025</i> <br> <b> Citation Guidelines</b> 1. To cite the codebook (or any other documentation associated with the Cline Center Coup d’État Project Dataset) please use the following citation: Peyton, Buddy, Joseph Bajjalieh, Dan Shalmon, Michael Martin, Jonathan Bonaguro, and Scott Althaus. 2025. “Cline Center Coup d’État Project Dataset Codebook”. Cline Center Coup d’État Project Dataset. Cline Center for Advanced Social Research. V.2.2.0. Janurary 30. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. doi: 10.13012/B2IDB-9651987_V8 2. To cite data from the Cline Center Coup d’État Project Dataset please use the following citation (filling in the correct date of access): Peyton, Buddy, Joseph Bajjalieh, Michael Martin, Sam Alahi, Norah Fadell, and Maddie Jeralds. 2025. Cline Center Coup d’État Project Dataset. Cline Center for Advanced Social Research. V.2.2.0. Janurary 30. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. doi: 10.13012/B2IDB-9651987_V8

Terrorism is among the most pressing challenges to democratic governance around the world. The Responsible Terrorism Coverage (or ResTeCo) project aims to address a fundamental dilemma facing 21st century societies: how to give citizens the information they need without giving terrorists the kind of attention they want. The ResTeCo hopes to inform best practices by using extreme-scale text analytic methods to extract information from more than 70 years of terrorism-related media coverage from around the world and across 5 languages. Our goal is to expand the available data on media responses to terrorism and enable the development of empirically-validated models for socially responsible, effective news organizations. This particular dataset contains information extracted from terrorism-related stories in the New York Times published between 1945 and 2018. It includes variables that measure the relative share of terrorism-related topics, the valence and intensity of emotional language, as well as the people, places, and organizations mentioned. This dataset contains 3 files: 1. <i>"ResTeCo Project NYT Dataset Variable Descriptions.pdf"</i> <ul> <li>A detailed codebook containing a summary of the Responsible Terrorism Coverage (ResTeCo) Project New York Times (NYT) Dataset and descriptions of all variables. </li> </ul> 2. <i>"resteco-nyt.csv"</i> <ul><li>This file contains the data extracted from terrorism-related media coverage in the New York Times between 1945 and 2018. It includes variables that measure the relative share of topics, sentiment, and emotion present in this coverage. There are also variables that contain metadata and list the people, places, and organizations mentioned in these articles. There are 53 variables and 438,373 observations. The variable "id" uniquely identifies each observation. Each observation represents a single news article. </li> <li> <b>Please note</b> that care should be taken when using "resteco-nyt.csv". The file may not be suitable to use in a spreadsheet program like Excel as some of the values get to be quite large. Excel cannot handle some of these large values, which may cause the data to appear corrupted within the software. It is encouraged that a user of this data use a statistical package such as Stata, R, or Python to ensure the structure and quality of the data remains preserved.</li> </ul> 3. <i>"README.md"</i> <ul><li>This file contains useful information for the user about the dataset. It is a text file written in mark down language</li> </ul> <b>Citation Guidelines</b> 1) To cite this codebook please use the following citation: Althaus, Scott, Joseph Bajjalieh, Marc Jungblut, Dan Shalmon, Subhankar Ghosh, and Pradnyesh Joshi. 2020. Responsible Terrorism Coverage (ResTeCo) Project New York Times (NYT) Dataset Variable Descriptions. Responsible Terrorism Coverage (ResTeCo) Project New York Times Dataset. Cline Center for Advanced Social Research. May 13. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. doi: 10.13012/B2IDB-4638196_V1 2) To cite the data please use the following citation: Althaus, Scott, Joseph Bajjalieh, Marc Jungblut, Dan Shalmon, Subhankar Ghosh, and Pradnyesh Joshi. 2020. Responsible Terrorism Coverage (ResTeCo) Project New York Times Dataset. Cline Center for Advanced Social Research. May 13. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. doi: 10.13012/B2IDB-4638196_V1

Tab-separated value (TSV) file. 14745 data rows. Each data row represents publication metadata as retrieved from Crossref (http://crossref.org) 2023-04-05 when searching for retracted publications. Each row has the following columns: Index - Our index, starting with 0. DOI - Digital Object Identifier (DOI) for the publication Year - Publication year associated with the DOI. URL - Web location associated with the DOI. Title - Title associated with the DOI. May be blank. Author - Author(s) associated with the DOI. Journal - Publication venue (journal, conference, ...) associated with the DOI RetractionYear - Retraction Year associated with the DOI. May be blank. Category - One or more categories associated with the DOI. May be blank. Our search was via the Crossref REST API and searched for: Update_type=( 'retraction', 'Retraction', 'retracion', 'retration', 'partial_retraction', 'withdrawal','removal')

Data on Croatian restaurant allergen disclosures on restaurant websites, on-line menus and social media comments

The dissertation_demo.zip contains the base code and demonstration purpose for the dissertation: A Conceptual Model for Transparent, Reusable, and Collaborative Data Cleaning. Each chapter has a demo folder for demonstrating provenance queries or tools. The Airbnb dataset for demonstration and simulation is not included in this demo but is available to access directly from the reference website. Any updates on demonstration and examples can be found online at: https://github.com/nikolausn/dissertation_demo

This project investigates retraction indexing agreement among data sources: Crossref, Retraction Watch, Scopus, and Web of Science. As of July 2024, this reassesses the April 2023 union list of Schneider et al. (2023): https://doi.org/10.55835/6441e5cae04dbe5586d06a5f. As of April 2023, over 1 in 5 DOIs had discrepancies in retraction indexing among the 49,924 DOIs indexed as retracted in at least one of Crossref, Retraction Watch, Scopus, and Web of Science (Schneider et al., 2023). Here, we determine what changed in 15 months. Pipeline code to get the results files can be found in the GitHub repository https://github.com/infoqualitylab/retraction-indexing-agreement in the iPython notebook 'MET-STI2024_Reassessment_of_retraction_indexing_agreement.ipynb' Some files have been redacted to remove proprietary data, as noted in README.txt. Among our sources, data is openly available only for Crossref and Retraction Watch. FILE FORMATS: 1) unionlist_completed_2023-09-03-crws-ressess.csv - UTF-8 CSV file 2) unionlist_completed-ria_2024-07-09-crws-ressess.csv - UTF-8 CSV file 3) unionlist-15months-period_sankey.png - Portable Network Graphics (PNG) file 4) unionlist_ria_proportion_comparison.png - Portable Network Graphics (PNG) file 5) README.txt - text file FILE DESCRIPTION: Description of the files can be found in README.txt

The XSEDE program manages the database of allocation awards for the portfolio of advanced research computing resources funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF). The database holds data for allocation awards dating to the start of the TeraGrid program in 2004 through the XSEDE operational period, which ended August 31, 2022. The project data include lead researcher and affiliation, title and abstract, field of science, and the start and end dates. Along with the project information, the data set includes resource allocation and usage data for each award associated with the project. The data show the transition of resources over a fifteen year span along with the evolution of researchers, fields of science, and institutional representation. Because the XSEDE program has ended, the allocation_award_history file includes all allocations activity initiated via XSEDE processes through August 31, 2022. The Resource Providers and successor program to XSEDE agreed to honor all project allocations made during XSEDE. Thus, allocation awards that extend beyond the end of XSEDE may not reflect all activity that may ultimately be part of the project award. Similarly, allocation usage data only reflects usage reported through August 31, 2022, and may not reflect all activity that may ultimately be conducted by projects that were active beyond XSEDE.

This dataset is derived from the COCI, the OpenCitations Index of Crossref open DOI-to-DOI references (opencitations.net). Silvio Peroni, David Shotton (2020). OpenCitations, an infrastructure organization for open scholarship. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1): 428-444. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00023 We have curated it to remove duplicates, self-loops, and parallel edges. These data were copied from the Open Citations website on May 6, 2023 and subsequently processed to produce a node list and an edge-list. Integer_ids have been assigned to the DOIs to reduce memory and storage needs when working with these data. As noted on the Open Citation website, each record is a citing-cited pair that uses DOIs as persistent identifiers.

The PDF describes the process and data used for the heuristic user evaluation described in the related article “<i>Evaluating an automatic data extraction tool based on the theory of diffusion of innovation</i>” by Linh Hoang, Frank Scannapieco, Linh Cao, Yingjun Guan, Yi-Yun Cheng, and Jodi Schneider (under submission).<br /> Frank Scannapieco assessed RobotReviewer data extraction performance on ten articles in 2018-02. Articles are included papers from an update review: Sabharwal A., G.-F.I., Stellrecht E., Scannapeico F.A. <i>Periodontal therapy to prevent the initiation and/or progression of common complex systemic diseases and conditions</i>. An update. Periodontol 2000. In Press. <br/> The form was created in consultation with Linh Hoang and Jodi Schneider. To do the assessment, Frank Scannapieco entered PDFs for these ten articles into RobotReviewer and then filled in ten evaluation forms, based on the ten Robot Reviewer automatic data extraction reports. Linh Hoang analyzed these ten evaluation forms and synthesized Frank Scannapieco’s comments to arrive at the evaluation results for the heuristic user evaluation.

The XSEDE program manages the database of allocation awards for the portfolio of advanced research computing resources funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF). The database holds data for allocation awards dating to the start of the TeraGrid program in 2004 to present, with awards continuing through the end of the second XSEDE award in 2021. The project data include lead researcher and affiliation, title and abstract, field of science, and the start and end dates. Along with the project information, the data set includes resource allocation and usage data for each award associated with the project. The data show the transition of resources over a fifteen year span along with the evolution of researchers, fields of science, and institutional representation.

This dataset was developed as part of a study that examined the correlational relationships between local journal authorship, local and external citation counts, full-text downloads, link-resolver clicks, and four global journal impact factor indices within an all-disciplines journal collection of 12,200 titles and six subject subsets at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) Library. While earlier investigations of the relationships between usage (downloads) and citation metrics have been inconclusive, this study shows strong correlations in the all-disciplines set and most subject subsets. The normalized Eigenfactor was the only global impact factor index that correlated highly with local journal metrics. Some of the identified disciplinary variances among the six subject subsets may be explained by the journal publication aspirations of UIUC researchers. The correlations between authorship and local citations in the six specific subject subsets closely match national department or program rankings. All the raw data used in this analysis, in the form of relational database tables with multiple columns. Can be opned using MS Access. Description for variables can be viewed through "Design View" (by right clik on the selected table, choose "Design View"). The 2 PDF files provide an overview of tables are included in each MDB file. In addition, the processing scripts and Pearson correlation code is available at <a href="https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-0931140_V1">https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-0931140_V1</a>.

This dataset is derived from the raw dataset (https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-4950847_V1) and collects entity mentions that were manually determined to be noisy, non-species entities.

This dataset is derived from the raw entity mention dataset (https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-4950847_V1) for species entities and represents those that were determined to be species (i.e., were not noisy entities) but for which no corresponding concept could be found in the NCBI taxonomy database.

This dataset represents the results of manual cleaning and annotation of the entity mentions contained in the raw dataset (https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-4163883_V1). Each mention has been consolidated and linked to an identifier for a matching concept from the NCBI's taxonomy database.

This dataset is derived from the raw dataset (https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-4163883_V1) and collects entity mentions that were manually determined to be noisy, non-chemical entities.

This dataset is derived from the raw entity mention dataset (https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-4163883_V1) for checmical entities and represents those that were determined to be chemicals (i.e., were not noisy entities) but for which no corresponding concept could be found in the ChEBI ontology.

A set of gene and gene-related entity mentions derived from an NERC dataset analyzing 900 synthetic biology articles published by the ACS. This data is associated with the Synthetic Biology Knowledge System repository (https://web.synbioks.org/). The data in this dataset are raw mentions from the NERC data.