Datasets

Information on the location, dimensions, time of treefall or death, decay state, wood nutrient, wood pH and wood density data, and soil moisture, slope, distance from forest edge and soil nutrient data associated with the publication "Interspecific wood trait variation predicts decreased carbon residence time in changing forests" authored by Sierra Perez, Jennifer Fraterrigo, and James Dalling. ** <b>Note:</b> Blank cells indicate that no data were collected.

This is the 5 states 5000 cells synthetic expression file we used for validation of SimiC, a single cell gene regulatory network inference method with similarity constraints. Ground truth GRNs are stored in Numpy array format, and expression profiles of all states combined are stored in Pandas DataFrame in format of Pickle files.

Drainage network analysis is fundamental to understanding the characteristics of surface hydrology. Based on elevation data, drainage network analysis is often used to extract key hydrological features like drainage networks and streamlines. Limited by raster-based data models, conventional drainage network algorithms typically allow water to flow in 4 or 8 directions (surrounding grids) from a raster grid. To resolve this limitation, this paper describes a new vector-based method for drainage network analysis that allows water to flow in any direction around each location. The method is enabled by rapid advances in Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) remote sensing and high-performance computing. The drainage network analysis is conducted using a high-density point cloud instead of Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) at coarse resolutions. Our computational experiments show that the vector-based method can better capture water flows without limiting the number of directions due to imprecise DEMs. Our case study applies the method to Rowan County watershed, North Carolina in the US. After comparing the drainage networks and streamlines detected with corresponding reference data from US Geological Survey generated from the Geonet software, we find that the new method performs well in capturing the characteristics of water flows on landscape surfaces in order to form an accurate drainage network. This dataset contains all the code, notebooks, datasets used in the study conducted for the research publication titled " A Vector-Based Method for Drainage Network Analysis Based on LiDAR Data ". ## What's Inside A quick explanation of the components * `A Vector Approach to Drainage Network Analysis Based on LiDAR Data.ipynb` is a notebook for finding the drainage network based on LiDAR data *`Picture1.png` is a picture representing the pseudocode of our new algorithm * HPC` folder contains codes for running the algorithm with sbatch in HPC ** `execute.sh` is a bash script file that use sbatch to conduct large scale analysis for the algorithm ** `run.sh` is a bash script file that calls the script file `execute.sh` for large scale calculation for the algorithm ** `run.py` includes the codes implemented for the algorithm * `Rowan Creek Data` includes data that are used in the study ** `3_1.las` and `3_2.las ` are the LiDAR data files that is used in our analysis presented in the paper. Users may use this data file to reproduce our results and may replace it with their own LiDAR file to run this method over different areas ** `reference` folder includes reference data from USGS *** `reference_3_1.tif` and `reference_3_2.tif` are reference data for the drainage system analysis retrieved from USGS.

This data set describes temperature, dissolved oxygen, and secchi depth in 1-m interval profiles in the deepest point in 10 Illinois reservoirs between the years 1995 and 2016.

This dataset contains the ClonalKinetic dataset that was used in SimiC and its intermediate results for comparison. The Detail description can be found in the text file 'clonalKinetics_Example_data_description.txt' and 'ClonalKinetics_filtered.DF_data_description.txt'. The required input data for SimiC contains: 1. ClonalKinetics_filtered.clustAssign.txt => cluster assignment for each cell. 2. ClonalKinetics_filtered.DF.pickle => filtered scRNAseq matrix. 3. ClonalKinetics_filtered.TFs.pickle => list of driver genes. The results after running SimiC contains: 1. ClonalKinetics_filtered_L10.01_L20.01_Ws.pickle => inferred GRNs for each cluster 2. ClonalKinetics_filtered_L10.01_L20.01_AUCs.pickle => regulon activity scores for each cell and each driver gene. <b>NOTE:</b> “ClonalKinetics_filtered.rds” file which is mentioned in “ClonalKinetics_filtered.DF_data_description.txt” is an intermediate file and the authors have put all the processed in the pickle/txt file as described in the filtered data text.

This dataset contains all the necessary information to recreate the study presented in the paper entitled "Learning coagulation processes with combinatorially-invariant neural networks". This consists of (1) the aggregated output files used for machine learning, (2) the machine learning codes used to learn the presented models, (3) the PartMC model source code that was used to generate the simulation data and (4) the Python scripts used construct the scenario library for training and testing simulations. This data was used to investigate a method (combinatorally-invariant neural network) for learning the aerosol process of coagulation. This data may be useful for application of other methods.

Increasingly pervasive location-aware sensors interconnected with rapidly advancing wireless network services are motivating the development of near-real-time urban analytics. This development has revealed both tremendous challenges and opportunities for scientific innovation and discovery. However, state-of-the-art urban discovery and innovation are not well equipped to resolve the challenges of such analytics, which in turn limits new research questions from being asked and answered. Specifically, commonly used urban analytics capabilities are typically designed to handle, process, and analyze static datasets that can be treated as map layers and are consequently ill-equipped in (a) resolving the volume and velocity of urban big data; (b) meeting the computing requirements for processing, analyzing, and visualizing these datasets; and (c) providing concurrent online access to such analytics. To tackle these challenges, we have developed a novel cyberGIS framework that includes computationally reproducible approaches to streaming urban analytics. This framework is based on CyberGIS-Jupyter, through integration of cyberGIS and real-time urban sensing, for achieving capabilities that have previously been unavailable toward helping cities solve challenging urban informatics problems. The files included in this dataset functions as follows: 1) Spatial_interpolation.ipynb is a python based Jupyter notebook that enables users to conduct spatial interpolation with AoT data; 2) Urban_Informatics.ipynb is a Jupyter notebook that helps to explore the AoT dataset; 3) chicago-complete.weekly.2019-09-30-to-2019-10-06.tar includes all the high-frequency urban sensing data from AoT sensors from 2019 September 30th to 2019 October 6th collected in Chicago, US; 4) sensors.csv is a processed dataset including information about the temperature in Chicago, and it is used in Spatial_interpolation.ipynb.

We studied vegetation metric robustness to environmental (season, interannual, and regional) and methodological (observer) variables, as well as adequate sample size for vegetation metrics across four regions of the United States.

Airglow images and Meteor radar data used in the paper "Mesospheric gravity wave activity estimated via airglow imagery, multistatic meteor radar, and SABER data taken during the SIMONe–2018 campaign".

All of the files in this dataset pertain to the evaluation of a novel statistic, Hind/He, for distinguishing Mendelian loci from paralogs. They are derived from a RAD-seq genotyping dataset of diploid and tetraploid Miscanthus sacchariflorus.

Metabolite identifications and profiles of liver samples from 22 day old male and female pigs from gilt that exposed to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (P) or not (C) that were weaned at 21 days of age (W) or not (N). Profiles were obtained by University of Illinois Carver Metabolomics Center. Spectrum for each sample was acquired using a gas chromatography mass spectrometry system consisting of an Agilent 7890 gas chromatograph, an Agilent 5975 MSD, and an HP 7683B auto sampler.

In 2020, early-season extreme precipitation events occurred following the planting of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench and Zea mays L. in central Illinois that caused ponding. Following the first rainfall event 50m transects were established to assess the waterlogging effects on seedling emergence and crop yields. Soil moisture, emergence, stem and tiller count, LAI, and yield were measured at various points in the season along these transects.

This data set contains mass spectrometry data used for the publication "mspack: efficient lossless and lossy mass spectrometry data compression".

1. Rice H2 - Destructive Harvest - These data are for the destructive harvest (above-ground biomass) of 30 diverse indica rice genotypes that were grown to evaluate natural variation as well as the heritability of photosynthesis-related traits. Traits measured include: plant height, leaf area, plant fresh and dry weights, and tiller number. 2. Rice H2 - ACi Response Summary - These data characterize the response of CO2 uptake to change in intercellular CO2 concentration in 30 diverse indica rice genotypes. These measurements were taken to evaluate natural variation and the heritability of photosynthesis-related traits in rice. 3. Rice H2 - Survey Style Gas Exchange Measurements - These data document steady-state survey style gas exchange measurements in 30 diverse indica rice genotypes. These measurements were taken to evaluate natural variation and the heritability of photosynthesis-related traits in rice.

This dataset contains the images of a photoperiod sensitive sorghum accession population used for a GWAS/TWAS study of leaf traits related to water use efficiency in 2016 and 2017. *<b>Note:</b> new in this second version is that JPG images outputted from the nms files were added <b>Accessions_2016.zip</b> and <b>Accessions_2017.zip</b>: contain raw images produced by Optical Topometer (nms files) for all sorghum accessions. Images can be opened with Nanofocus μsurf analysis extended software (Oberhausen,Germany). <b>Accessions_2016_jpg.zip</b> and <b>Accessions_2017_jpg.zip</b>: contain jpg images outputted from the nms files and used in the machine learning phenotyping.

This geodatabase serves two purposes: 1) to provide State of Illinois agencies with a fast resource for the preparation of maps and figures that require the use of shape or line files from federal agencies, the State of Illinois, or the City of Chicago, and 2) as a start for social scientists interested in exploring how geographic information systems (whether this is data visualization or geographically weighted regression) can bring new meaning to the interpretation of their data. All layer files included are relevant to the State of Illinois. Sources for this geodatabase include the U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Geological Survey, City of Chicago, Chicago Public Schools, Chicago Transit Authority, Regional Transportation Authority, and Bureau of Transportation Statistics.

This dataset contains data derived from large-scale particle velocimetry measurements obtained at the confluence of the Saline Branch and an unnamed tributary in Illinois. The data were collected using two cameras positioned about the confluence, one mounted on a cable and the other mounted on a tripod. A description of the content of the files can be found in Description of Files.rtf.

This dataset containes the images of B73xMS71 RIL population used in QTL linkage mapping for maize epidermal traits in year 2016 and 2017. 2016RIL_all_mns.rar and 2017RIL_all_mns.rar: contain raw images produced by Nanofocus lsurf Explorer Optical Topometer (Oberhausen, Germany) at 20X magnification with 0.6 numerical aperture. Files were processed in Nanofocus μsurf analysis extended software (Oberhausen,Germany). 2016RIL_all_TIF.rar and 2017RIL_all_TIF.rar: contain images processed from the Topology layer in each nms file to strengthen the edges of cell outlines, and used in downstream cell detection. 2016RIL_all_detection_result.rar and 2017RIL_all_detection_result.rar: contain images with epidermal cells predicted using the Mask R-CNN model. training data.rar: contain images used for Mask R-CNN model training and validation.

This data comes from a scoping review associated with the project called Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science. The data summarizes the fields that have been explored by existing research on retraction, a list of studies comparing retraction in different fields, and a list of studies focused on retraction of COVID-19 articles.

This dataset contains EEG and Temperature data acquired from inside the bore of an MRI scanner during scanning with two different types of fMRI sequences: single-band and and multi-band. The EEG data were acquired from the heads of adult humans undergoing scanning, and can be used to assess differences in EEG data quality due to sequence type. The temperature data were acquired from a watermelon phantom and can be used to assess heating differences due to sequence type.

This dataset includes five files. Descriptions of the files are given as follows: <b>FILENAME: PubMed_retracted_publication_full_v3.tsv</b> - Bibliographic data of retracted papers indexed in PubMed (retrieved on August 20, 2020, searched with the query "retracted publication" [PT] ). - Except for the information in the "cited_by" column, all the data is from PubMed. - PMIDs in the "cited_by" column that meet either of the two conditions below have been excluded from analyses: [1] PMIDs of the citing papers are from retraction notices (i.e., those in the “retraction_notice_PMID.csv” file). [2] Citing paper and the cited retracted paper have the same PMID. ROW EXPLANATIONS - Each row is a retracted paper. There are 7,813 retracted papers. COLUMN HEADER EXPLANATIONS 1) PMID - PubMed ID 2) Title - Paper title 3) Authors - Author names 4) Citation - Bibliographic information of the paper 5) First Author - First author's name 6) Journal/Book - Publication name 7) Publication Year 8) Create Date - The date the record was added to the PubMed database 9) PMCID - PubMed Central ID (if applicable, otherwise blank) 10) NIHMS ID - NIH Manuscript Submission ID (if applicable, otherwise blank) 11) DOI - Digital object identifier (if applicable, otherwise blank) 12) retracted_in - Information of retraction notice (given by PubMed) 13) retracted_yr - Retraction year identified from "retracted_in" (if applicable, otherwise blank) 14) cited_by - PMIDs of the citing papers. (if applicable, otherwise blank) Data collected from iCite. 15) retraction_notice_pmid - PMID of the retraction notice (if applicable, otherwise blank) <b>FILENAME: PubMed_retracted_publication_CitCntxt_withYR_v3.tsv</b> - This file contains citation contexts (i.e., citing sentences) where the retracted papers were cited. The citation contexts were identified from the XML version of PubMed Central open access (PMCOA) articles. - This is part of the data from: Hsiao, T.-K., & Torvik, V. I. (manuscript in preparation). Citation contexts identified from PubMed Central open access articles: A resource for text mining and citation analysis. - Citation contexts that meet either of the two conditions below have been excluded from analyses: [1] PMIDs of the citing papers are from retraction notices (i.e., those in the “retraction_notice_PMID.csv” file). [2] Citing paper and the cited retracted paper have the same PMID. ROW EXPLANATIONS - Each row is a citation context associated with one retracted paper that's cited. - In the manuscript, we count each citation context once, even if it cites multiple retracted papers. COLUMN HEADER EXPLANATIONS 1) pmcid - PubMed Central ID of the citing paper 2) pmid - PubMed ID of the citing paper 3) year - Publication year of the citing paper 4) location - Location of the citation context (abstract = abstract, body = main text, back = supporting material, tbl_fig_caption = tables and table/figure captions) 5) IMRaD - IMRaD section of the citation context (I = Introduction, M = Methods, R = Results, D = Discussions/Conclusion, NoIMRaD = not identified) 6) sentence_id - The ID of the citation context in a given location. For location information, please see column 4. The first sentence in the location gets the ID 1, and subsequent sentences are numbered consecutively. 7) total_sentences - Total number of sentences in a given location 8) intxt_id - Identifier of a cited paper. Here, a cited paper is the retracted paper. 9) intxt_pmid - PubMed ID of a cited paper. Here, a cited paper is the retracted paper. 10) citation - The citation context 11) progression - Position of a citation context by centile within the citing paper. 12) retracted_yr - Retraction year of the retracted paper 13) post_retraction - 0 = not post-retraction citation; 1 = post-retraction citation. A post-retraction citation is a citation made after the calendar year of retraction. <b>FILENAME: 724_knowingly_post_retraction_cit.csv</b> (updated) - The 724 post-retraction citation contexts that we determined knowingly cited the 7,813 retracted papers in "PubMed_retracted_publication_full_v3.tsv". - Two citation contexts from retraction notices have been excluded from analyses. ROW EXPLANATIONS - Each row is a citation context. COLUMN HEADER EXPLANATIONS 1) pmcid - PubMed Central ID of the citing paper 2) pmid - PubMed ID of the citing paper 3) pub_type - Publication type collected from the metadata in the PMCOA XML files. 4) pub_type2 - Specific article types. Please see the manuscript for explanations. 5) year - Publication year of the citing paper 6) location - Location of the citation context (abstract = abstract, body = main text, back = supporting material, table_or_figure_caption = tables and table/figure captions) 7) intxt_id - Identifier of a cited paper. Here, a cited paper is the retracted paper. 8) intxt_pmid - PubMed ID of a cited paper. Here, a cited paper is the retracted paper. 9) citation - The citation context 10) retracted_yr - Retraction year of the retracted paper 11) cit_purpose - Purpose of citing the retracted paper. This is from human annotations. Please see the manuscript for further information about annotation. 12) longer_context - A extended version of the citation context. (if applicable, otherwise blank) Manually pulled from the full-texts in the process of annotation. <b>FILENAME: Annotation manual.pdf</b> - The manual for annotating the citation purposes in column 11) of the 724_knowingly_post_retraction_cit.tsv. <b>FILENAME: retraction_notice_PMID.csv</b> (new file added for this version) - A list of 8,346 PMIDs of retraction notices indexed in PubMed (retrieved on August 20, 2020, searched with the query "retraction of publication" [PT] ).

Data associated with the manuscript "Do rusty crayfish invasions affect water clarity in north temperate lakes?" by Daniel K. Szydlowski, Melissa K. Daniels, and Eric R. lARSON

This dataset contains data from extreme-disagreement analysis described in paper “Aaron M. Cohen, Jodi Schneider, Yuanxi Fu, Marian S. McDonagh, Prerna Das, Arthur W. Holt, Neil R. Smalheiser, 2021, Fifty Ways to Tag your Pubtypes: Multi-Tagger, a Set of Probabilistic Publication Type and Study Design Taggers to Support Biomedical Indexing and Evidence-Based Medicine.” In this analysis, our team experts carried out an independent formal review and consensus process for extreme disagreements between MEDLINE indexing and model predictive scores. “Extreme disagreements” included two situations: (1) an abstract was MEDLINE indexed as a publication type but received low scores for this publication type, and (2) an abstract received high scores for a publication type but lacked the corresponding MEDLINE index term. “High predictive score” is defined as the top 100 high-scoring, and “low predictive score” is defined as the bottom 100 low-scoring. Three publication types were analyzed, which are CASE_CONTROL_STUDY, COHORT_STUDY, and CROSS_SECTIONAL_STUDY. Results were recorded in three Excel workbooks, named after the publication types: case_control_study.xlsx, cohort_study.xlsx, and cross_sectional_study.xlsx. The analysis shows that, when the tagger gave a high predictive score (>0.9) on articles that lacked a corresponding MEDLINE indexing term, independent review suggested that the model assignment was correct in almost all cases (CROSS_SECTIONAL_STUDY (99%), CASE_CONTROL_STUDY (94.9%), and COHORT STUDY (92.2%)). Conversely, when articles received MEDLINE indexing but model predictive scores were very low (<0.1), independent review suggested that the model assignment was correct in the majority of cases: CASE_CONTROL_STUDY (85.4%), COHORT STUDY (76.3%), and CROSS_SECTIONAL_STUDY (53.6%). Based on the extreme disagreement analysis, we identified a number of false-positives (FPs) and false-negatives (FNs). For case control study, there were 5 FPs and 14 FNs. For cohort study, there were 7 FPs and 22 FNs. For cross-sectional study, there were 1 FP and 45 FNs. We reviewed and grouped them based on patterns noticed, providing clues for further improving the models. This dataset reports the instances of FPs and FNs along with their categorizations.

This dataset contains the protein sequences and trees used to compare Non-Ribosomal Peptide Synthetase (NRPS) condensation domains in the AMB gene cluster and was used to create figure S1 in Rojas et al. 2015. Instead of having to collect representative sequences independently, this set of condensation domain sequences may serve as a quick reference set for coarse classification of condensation domains.

This dataset contains 1) the cleaned version of 11 CRW datasets, 2) RNASim10k dataset in high fragmentation and 3) three CRW datasets (16S.3, 16S.T, 16S.B.ALL) in high fragmentation.