Dataset Search Results

Table S2. Raw pollen counts and climatic data for each seasonal sampling period. Climatic data reflects the average daily conditions observed over the duration samples were collected (˚C/day, mm/day, MJ/m2/day). Lycopodium counts and counts for each pollen taxon reflect the aggregated pollen sum from four sampling heights.

Table S3. Mean slope response for each predictive model used in the ecoinformatic analysis. Mean responses are provided for each seasonal and annual pollen data set analyzed from BCI and PNSL and are summarized by life form. Calculated p-values are provided for each model.

Datasets used in the study, "Optimal completion of incomplete gene trees in polynomial time using OCTAL," presented at WABI 2017.

Dataset includes maternal antigen treatment and early-life antigen treatment for male zebra finches. Also includes data on beak coloration, measures of song complexity for each male, and female responses to treated males. Male beak color and song metadata: * MATID= Maternal Identity * MATTRT=Maternal antigen treatment prior to egg laying (KLH=keyhole limpet hemocyanin, LPS= lipopolysaccharide, PBS=phosphate buffered saline) * YGTRT= Young antigen treatment post-hatch (KLH=keyhole limpet hemocyanin, LPS= lipopolysaccharide, PBS=phosphate buffered saline)) * NESTBANDNUM= Nestling band number * Haptoglobin=haptoglobin levels at day 28 (mg/ml) * Mean TE= Mean number of total elements in that male's song * TE (z)= Z-transformed total elements * Mean UE=Mean number of unique elements in the song * UE (z)= z-transformed unique elements * mean phrases= Mean number of song phrases * Phrases (z)= z-transformed song phrases * Mean D= Mean song duration in seconds * D (z)=z-transformed song duration * B2 standard=beak brightness standardized so that lower values reflect less bright beaks * B2 (z)=z-transformed brightness * S1R standard= beak saturation at high wavelengths standardized so that lower values reflect less red beaks * S1R (z)=z-transformed S1R * S1U standard= beak saturation at low wavelengths standardized so that lower values reflect less red beaks * S1U (z)=z-transformed S1U * H4B standard= beak hue standardized so that lower values reflect less red beaks * H4B (z)=z-transformed H4B Female choice metadata: * Control Bird=PBS denotes that all control males received phosphate buffered saline * Treatment Bird= Treatment the male received (keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) or lipopolysaccharide (LPS)) * Beak Wipes Control=# of beak wipes the female performed when on the control male side * Beak Wipes Treatment=# of beak wipes the female performed when on the "treatment male" side * Hops Control=# of hops female performed when on the control male side * Hops Treatment=# of hops female performed when on the treatment male side * Time Spent Near Control=amount of time (sec) female spent on the control male side * Time Spent Near Treatment=amount of time (sec) the female spent on the treatment male side

Data (fish growth, prey responses) from a series of experiments examining interspecific interactions between native and invasive juvenile fishes.

This data was collected between 2004 and 2010 at White River National Wildlife Refuge (WRNWR) and Saint Francis National Forest (SF). It was collected as part of two master’s and one PhD project at Arkansas State University USA studying Swainson’s Warbler habitat use, survival, and body condition.

GBS data from diverse sorghum lines. Project funded by DOE, ARPA-E, and startup funds to PJ Brown.

GBS data from biparental sorghum populations provided by Dr. Bill Rooney, TAMU. Data produced and analyzed by Pradeep Hirannaiah to study recombination in sorghum. Funding for this study was provided by the Sorghum Checkoff.

GBS data from diverse sorghum lines. Project funded by DOE, ARPA-E, and startup funds to PJ Brown.

This is the dataset used in the BioScience publication of the same name. More information about this dataset: Interested parties can request data from the Critical Trends Assessment Program, which was the source for the data on natural areas in this study. More information on the program and data requests can be obtained by visiting the program webpage. Critical Trends Assessment Program, Illinois Natural History Survey. http://wwx.inhs.illinois.edu/research/ctap/ These spatial datasets were used for analyses: Illinois Natural History Survey. 2003. Illinois GAP analysis land cover classification 1999-2000, 1:100 000 Scale, Raster Digital Data, Version 2.0. Champaign, IL, USA. Illinois State Geological Survey. 1995. Illinois Landcover Thematic Map Coverage Map 1991-1995. Champaign, IL, USA. Illinois State Geological Survey. 2001. Illinois Landcover Thematic Map Coverage Map 1999-2000. Champaign, IL, USA. USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service Cropland Data Layer. 1999-2015. Published crop-specific data layer [Online]. Available at https://nassgeodata.gmu.edu/CropScape/. USDA-NASS, Washington, DC. Information on agricultural practices and landcover changes were derived from the following U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) resources: USDA Economic Research Service. 2016. Adoption of Genetically Engineered Crops in the U.S. Available at http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/. USDA-ERS, Washington, DC. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2015. Summary Report: 2012 National Resources Inventory. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcseprd396218.pdf. USDA-NRCS, Washington, DC, and Center for Survey Statistics and Methodology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.