Displaying 376 - 400 of 639 in total

Subject Area

Life Sciences (335)
Social Sciences (135)
Physical Sciences (92)
Technology and Engineering (62)
Uncategorized (14)
Arts and Humanities (1)

Funder

Other (193)
U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) (189)
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) (64)
U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) (60)
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (42)
Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) (17)
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) (6)
U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) (5)
Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) (4)
U.S. Army (2)

Publication Year

2021 (108)
2022 (108)
2020 (96)
2023 (78)
2019 (72)
2018 (62)
2024 (42)
2017 (36)
2016 (30)
2025 (2)
2009 (1)
2011 (1)
2012 (1)
2014 (1)
2015 (1)

License

CC0 (356)
CC BY (263)
custom (20)

Datasets

published: 2021-06-08
 
Dataset associated with Jones and Ward JAE-2020-0031.R1 submission: Pre-to post-fledging carryover effects and the adaptive significance of variation in wing development for juvenile songbirds. Excel CSV files with data used in analyses and file with descriptions of each column. The flight ability variable in this dataset was derived from fledgling drop tests, examples of which can be found in the related dataset: Jones, Todd M.; Benson, Thomas J.; Ward, Michael P. (2019): Flight Ability of Juvenile Songbirds at Fledgling: Examples of Fledgling Drop Tests. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-2044905_V1.
keywords: fledgling; wing development; life history; adaptive significance; post-fledging; songbirds
published: 2021-05-21
 
Data sets from "Inferring Species Trees from Gene-Family with Duplication and Loss using Multi-Copy Gene-Family Tree Decomposition." It contains trees and sequences simulated with gene duplication and loss under a variety of different conditions. <b>Note:</b> - trees.tar.gz contains the simulated gene-family trees used in our experiments (both true trees from SimPhy as well as trees estimated from alignements). - sequences.tar.gz contains simulated sequence data used for estimating the gene-family trees as well as the concatenation analysis. - biological.tar.gz contains the gene trees used as inputs for the experiments we ran on empirical data sets as well as species trees outputted by the methods we tested on those data sets. - stats.txt list statistics (such as AD, MGTE, and average size) for our simulated model conditions.
keywords: gene duplication and loss; species-tree inference; simulated data;
published: 2021-05-26
 
Steady-state and dynamic gas exchange data for maize (B73), sugarcane (CP88-1762) and sorghum (Tx430)
keywords: C4 plants; gas exchange
published: 2021-05-14
 
This is the complete dataset for the "Anomalous density fluctuations in a strange metal" Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences publication (https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1721495115). This is an integration of the Zenodo dataset which includes raw M-EELS data. <b>METHODOLOGICAL INFORMATION</b> 1. Description of methods used for collection/generation of data: Data have been collected with a M-EELS instrument and according to the data acquisition protocol described in the original PNAS publication and in SciPost Phys. 3, 026 (2017) (doi: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.3.4.026) 2. Methods for processing the data: Raw data were collected with a channeltron-based M-EELS apparatus described in the reference PNAS publication and analyzed according to the procedure outlined both in the PNAS paper and in SciPost Phys. 3, 026 (2017) (doi: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.3.4.026). The raw M-EELS spectra at each momentum have been subject to minor data processing involving: (a) averaging of different acquisitions at the same conditions, (b) energy binning, (c) division of an effective Coulomb matrix element (which yields a structure factor S(q,\omega)), (d) antisymmetrization (which yields the imaginary chi) All these procedures are described in the PNAS paper. 3. Instrument- or software-specific information needed to interpret the data: These data are simple .txt or .dat files which can be read with any standard data analysis software, notably Python notebooks, MatLab, Origin, IgorPro, and others. We do not include scripts in order to provide maximum flexibility. 4. Relationship between files, if important: We divided in different folders raw data, structure factors and imaginary chi. <b>DATA-SPECIFIC INFORMATION</b> There are 8 folders within the Data_public_deposition_v1.zip. Each folder contain data needed to create the corresponding figure in the publication. <b>1. Fig1:</b> This folder contains 21 DAT files needed to plot the theory data in panels C and D, following this naming conventions: [chiA]or[chiB]or[Pi]_q_number.dat With chiA is the imaginary RPA charge susceptibility with a Coulomb interaction of electronically weakly coupled layers chiB is the imaginary RPA charge susceptibility with the usual 4\pi e^2/q^2 Coulomb interaction. Pi is the imaginary Lindhard polarizability. q is momentum in reciprocal lattice units Number is the numerical momentum value in reciprocal lattice units <b>2. Fig2:</b> Files needed to plot Fig. 2 of the PNAS paper. Contains 3 folders as listed below. The files in this folder are named following this convention: Bi2212_295K_(1,-1)_50eV_161107_q_number_2.16_avg.dat, 295K is the sample temperature (1,-1) is the momentum direction in reciprocal lattice units 50 eV is the incident e beam energy 161107 is the start date of the experiment in yymmdd format Q is the momentum Number is the momentum in reciprocal lattice units 2.16 is the energy range covered by the data in eV Avg identifies averaged data ImChi: is the imaginary susceptibility obtained by antisymmetryzing the structure factor Raw_avg_data: raw averaged M-EELS spectra Sqw: Structure factors derived from the M-EELS spectra <b>3. Fig3:</b> Files needed to plot Fig. 3 of the PNAS paper. OP/ OD prefix identifies optimally doped or overdosed sample data, respectively. ImChi: is the imaginary susceptibility obtained by antisymmetryzing the structure factor Raw_avg_data: raw averaged M-EELS spectra Sqw: Structure factors derived from the M-EELS spectra <b>4. Fig4:</b> Files needed to plot Fig. 4 of the PNAS paper. The _fit_parameters.dat file contains the fit parameters extracted according to the fit procedure described in the manuscript and at all momenta. ImChi: is the imaginary susceptibility obtained by antisymmetryzing the structure factor Raw_avg_data: raw averaged M-EELS spectra Sqw: Structure factors derived from the M-EELS spectra <b>5. FigS1:</b> Files needed to plot Fig. S1 of the PNAS paper. There are 5 files in this folder. DAT files are M-EELS data following the prior naming convention, while the two .txt files are digitized data from N. Nücker, U. Eckern, J. Fink, and P. Müller, Long-Wavelength Collective Excitations of Charge Carriers in High-Tc Superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 44, 7155(R) (1991), and K. H. G. Schulte, The interplay of Spectroscopy and Correlated Materials, Ph.D. thesis, University of Groningen (2002). <b>6. FigS2:</b> Files needed to plot Fig. S2 of the PNAS paper. ImChi: is the imaginary susceptibility obtained by antisymmetryzing the structure factor Raw_avg_data: raw averaged M-EELS spectra Sqw: Structure factors derived from the M-EELS spectra <b>7. FigS3:</b> Files needed to plot Fig. S3 of the PNAS paper. There are 2 files in this folder: 20K_phi_0_q_0.dat: is a M-EELS raw intensity at zero momentum transfer on Bi2212 at 20 K 295K_phi_0_q_0.dat: is a M-EELS raw intensity at zero momentum transfer on Bi2212 at 295 K <b>8. FigS4:</b> Files needed to plot Fig. S4 of the PNAS paper. The _fit_parameters.dat file contains the fit parameters extracted according to the fit procedure described in the manuscript and at all momenta. ImChi: is the imaginary susceptibility obtained by antisymmetryzing the structure factor Raw_avg_data: raw averaged M-EELS spectra Sqw: Structure factors derived from the M-EELS spectra
keywords: Momentum resolved electron energy loss spectroscopy (M-EELS); cuprates; plasmons; strange metal
published: 2021-05-14
 
Please cite as: Menglin Liu and Benjamin M. Gramig. "Survey of Cover Crop, Conservation Tillage and Nutrient Management Practice Usage in Illinois and 2020 Fall Covers for Spring Savings Crop Insurance Discount Program Participation." Report to the Illinois Department of Agriculture and Fall Covers for Spring Savings working group. Center for the Economics of Sustainability and Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. 2021. https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-5222984_V1
keywords: cover crops; Illinois; 2020; conservation tillage; nutrient management practices; farmer survey; NLRS
published: 2021-05-14
 
- The aim of this research was to evaluate the novel dietary fiber source, miscanthus grass, in comparison to traditional fiber sources, and their effects on the microbiota of healthy adult cats. Four dietary treatments, cellulose (CO), miscanthus grass fiber (MF), a blend of miscanthus fiber and tomato pomace (MF+TP), or beet pulp (BP) were evaluated.<br /><br />- The study was conducted using a completely randomized design with twenty-eight neutered adult, domesticated shorthair cats (19 females and 9 males, mean age 2.2 ± 0.03 yr; mean body weight 4.6 ± 0.7 kg, mean body condition score 5.6 ± 0.6). Total DNA from fresh fecal samples was extracted using Mo-Bio PowerSoil kits (MO BIO Laboratories, Inc., Carlsbad, CA). Amplification of the 292 bp-fragment of V4 region from the 16S rRNA gene was completed using a Fluidigm Access Array (Fluidigm Corporation, South San Francisco, CA). Paired-end Illumina sequencing was performed on a MiSeq using v3 reagents (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA) at the Roy J. Carver Biotechnology Center at the University of Illinois. <br />- Filenames are composed of animal name identifier, diet (BP= beet pulp; CO= cellulose; MF= miscanthus grass fiber; TP= blend of miscanthus fiber and tomato pomace).
keywords: cats; dietary fiber; fecal microbiota; miscanthus grass; nutrient digestibility; postbiotics
published: 2021-05-14
 
This document contains the Supplemental Materials for Chapter 4: Climate Change Impacts on Agriculture from the report "An Assessment of the Impacts of Climate Change in Illinois" published in 2021.
keywords: Illinois; climate change; agriculture; impacts; adaptation; crop yield; ISAM; econometrics; days suitable for fieldwork
published: 2021-05-14
 
Please cite as: Jim Miller, Sergiusz Czesny, Qihong Dai, James Ellis, Louis Iverson, Jeff Matthews, Charles Roswell, Cory Suski, John Taft, and Mike Ward. 2021. “Climate Change Impacts on Ecosystems: Scientific and Common Species Names”.
keywords: Scientific names; Common names; Illinois species
published: 2021-05-14
 
Supplemental Forest Data for Chapter 6: Climate Change Impacts on Ecosystems in "An Assessment of the Impacts of Climate Change in Illinois"
published: 2020-10-28
 
We studied we examined the role of stream flow on environmental DNA (eDNA) concentrations and detectability of an invasive clam (Corbicula fluminea), while also accounting for other abiotic and biotic variables. This data includes the eDNA concentrations, quadrat estimates of clam density, and abiotic variables.
keywords: Corbicula; detection probability; eDNA; invasive species; lotic; occupancy modeling
published: 2021-05-13
 
Data files and R code to replicate the econometric analysis in the journal article: B Chen, BM Gramig and SD Yun. “Conservation Tillage Mitigates Drought Induced Soybean Yield Losses in the US Corn Belt.” Q Open. https://doi.org/10.1093/qopen/qoab007
keywords: R, Conservation Tillage, Drought, Yield, Corn, Soybeans, Resilience, Climate Change
published: 2021-05-07
 
Prepared by Vetle Torvik 2021-05-07 The dataset comes as a single tab-delimited Latin-1 encoded file (only the City column uses non-ASCII characters). • How was the dataset created? The dataset is based on a snapshot of PubMed (which includes Medline and PubMed-not-Medline records) taken in December, 2018. (NLMs baseline 2018 plus updates throughout 2018). Affiliations are linked to a particular author on a particular article. Prior to 2014, NLM recorded the affiliation of the first author only. However, MapAffil 2018 covers some PubMed records lacking affiliations that were harvested elsewhere, from PMC (e.g., PMID 22427989), NIH grants (e.g., 1838378), and Microsoft Academic Graph and ADS (e.g. 5833220). Affiliations are pre-processed (e.g., transliterated into ASCII from UTF-8 and html) so they may differ (sometimes a lot; see PMID 27487542) from PubMed records. All affiliation strings where processed using the MapAffil procedure, to identify and disambiguate the most specific place-name, as described in: Torvik VI. MapAffil: A bibliographic tool for mapping author affiliation strings to cities and their geocodes worldwide. D-Lib Magazine 2015; 21 (11/12). 10p • Look for Fig. 4 in the following article for coverage statistics over time: Palmblad, M., Torvik, V.I. Spatiotemporal analysis of tropical disease research combining Europe PMC and affiliation mapping web services. Trop Med Health 45, 33 (2017). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-017-0073-6">https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-017-0073-6</a> Expect to see big upticks in coverage of PMIDs around 1988 and for non-first authors in 2014. • The code and back-end data is periodically updated and made available for query by PMID at http://abel.ischool.illinois.edu/cgi-bin/mapaffil/search.py • What is the format of the dataset? The dataset contains 52,931,957 rows (plus a header row). Each row (line) in the file has a unique PMID and author order, and contains the following eighteen columns, tab-delimited. All columns are ASCII, except city which contains Latin-1. 1. PMID: positive non-zero integer; int(10) unsigned 2. au_order: positive non-zero integer; smallint(4) 3. lastname: varchar(80) 4. firstname: varchar(80); NLM started including these in 2002 but many have been harvested from outside PubMed 5. initial_2: middle name initial 6. orcid: From 2019 ORCID Public Data File https://orcid.org/ and from PubMed XML 7. year: year of the publication 8. journal: name of journal that the publication is published 9. affiliation: author's affiliation?? 10. disciplines: extracted from departments, divisions, schools, laboratories, centers, etc. that occur on at least unique 100 affiliations across the dataset, some with standardization (e.g., 1770799), English translations (e.g., 2314876), or spelling corrections (e.g., 1291843) 11. grid: inferred using a high-recall technique focused on educational institutions (but, for experimental purposes, includes a few select hospitals, national institutes/centers, international companies, governmental agencies, and 200+ other IDs [RINGGOLD, Wikidata, ISNI, VIAF, http] for institutions not in GRID). Based on 2019 GRID version https://www.grid.ac/ 12. type: EDU, HOS, EDU-HOS, ORG, COM, GOV, MIL, UNK 13. city: varchar(200); typically 'city, state, country' but could include further subdivisions; unresolved ambiguities are concatenated by '|' 14. state: Australia, Canada and USA (which includes territories like PR, GU, AS, and post-codes like AE and AA) 15. country 16. lat: at most 3 decimals (only available when city is not a country or state) 17. lon: at most 3 decimals (only available when city is not a country or state) 18. fips: varchar(5); for USA only retrieved by lat-lon query to https://geo.fcc.gov/api/census/block/find
keywords: PubMed, MEDLINE, Digital Libraries, Bibliographic Databases; Author Affiliations; Geographic Indexing; Place Name Ambiguity; Geoparsing; Geocoding; Toponym Extraction; Toponym Resolution; institution name disambiguation
published: 2021-05-12
 
These are the data sets associated with our publication "Field borders provide winter refuge for beneficial predators and parasitoids: a case study on organic farms." For this project, we compared the communities of overwintering arthropod natural enemies in organic cultivated fields and wildflower-strip field borders at five different sites in central Illinois. Abstract: Semi-natural field borders are frequently used in midwestern U.S. sustainable agriculture. These habitats are meant to help diversify otherwise monocultural landscapes and provision them with ecosystem services, including biological control. Predatory and parasitic arthropods (i.e., potential natural enemies) often flourish in these habitats and may move into crops to help control pests. However, detailed information on the capacity of semi-natural field borders for providing overwintering refuge for these arthropods is poorly understood. In this study, we used soil emergence tents to characterize potential natural enemy communities (i.e., predacious beetles, wasps, spiders, and other arthropods) overwintering in cultivated organic crop fields and adjacent field borders. We found a greater abundance, species richness, and unique community composition of predatory and parasitic arthropods in field borders compared to arable crop fields, which were generally poorly suited as overwintering habitat. Furthermore, potential natural enemies tended to be positively associated with forb cover and negatively associated with grass cover, suggesting that grassy field borders with less forb cover are less well-suited as winter refugia. These results demonstrate that semi-natural habitats like field borders may act as a source for many natural enemies on a year-to-year basis and are important for conserving arthropod diversity in agricultural landscapes.
keywords: Natural enemy; wildflower strips; conservation biological control; semi-natural habitat; field border; organic farming
published: 2021-05-10
 
UAV-based high-resolution multispectral time-series orthophotos utilized to understand the relation between growth dynamics, imagery temporal resolution, and end-of-season biomass productivity of biomass sorghum as bioenergy crop. Sensor utilized is a RedEdge Micasense flown at 40 meters above ground level at the Energy Farm- UIUC in 2019.
keywords: Unmanned aerial vehicles; High throughput phenotyping; Machine learning; Bioenergy crops
published: 2021-05-09
 
Raw data and its analysis collected from a trial designed to test the impact of providing a Bacillus-based direct-fed microbial (DFM) on the syndrome resulting from orally infecting pigs with either Salmonella enterica serotype Choleraesuis (S. Choleraesuis) alone, or in combination with an intranasal challenge, three days later, with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV).
keywords: excel file
published: 2021-05-07
 
- The objective of this study was to evaluate macronutrient apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD), gastrointestinal tolerance, and fermentative end-products in extruded, canine diets. <br />- Five diets were formulated to be isocaloric and isonitrogenous with either garbanzo beans (GBD), green lentils (GLD), peanut flour (PFD), dried yeast (DYD), or poultry by-product meal (CON) as the primary protein sources. Ten adult, intact, female beagles (mean age: 4.2 ± 1.1 yr, mean 28 weight: 11.9 ± 1.3 kg) were used in a replicated, 5x5 Latin square design with 14 d periods. Total DNA from fresh fecal samples was extracted using Mo-Bio PowerSoil kits (MO BIO Laboratories, Inc., Carlsbad, CA). Amplification of the 292 bp-fragment of V4 region from the 16S rRNA gene was completed using a Fluidigm Access Array (Fluidigm Corporation, South San Francisco, CA). Paired-end Illumina sequencing was performed on a MiSeq using v3 reagents (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA) at the Roy J. Carver Biotechnology Center at the University of Illinois. <br />- Filenames are composed of animal name identifier, diet (CON=control; DY= dried yeast; GB= garbanzo beans; GL= green lentils; PF= peanut flour) and period replicate number (P1, P2, P3, P4, and P5).
keywords: Dog; Digestibility; Legume; Microbiota; Pulse; Yeast
published: 2021-05-07
 
The dataset is based on a snapshot of PubMed taken in December 2018 (NLMs baseline 2018 plus updates throughout 2018), and for ORCIDs, primarily, the 2019 ORCID Public Data File https://orcid.org/. Matching an ORCID to an individual author name on a PMID is a non-trivial process. Anyone can create an ORCID and claim to have contributed to any published work. Many records claim too many articles and most claim too few. Even though ORCID records are (most?) often populated by author name searches in popular bibliographic databases, there is no confirmation that the person's name is listed on the article. This dataset is the product of mapping ORCIDs to individual author names on PMIDs, even when the ORCID name does not match any author name on the PMID, and when there are multiple (good) candidate author names. The algorithm avoids assigning the ORCID to an article when there are no good candidates and when there are multiple equally good matches. For some ORCIDs that clearly claim too much, it triggers a very strict matching procedure (for ORCIDs that claim too much but the majority appear correct, e.g., 0000-0002-2788-5457), and sometimes deletes ORCIDs altogether when all (or nearly all) of its claimed PMIDs appear incorrect. When an individual clearly has multiple ORCIDs it deletes the least complete of them (e.g., 0000-0002-1651-2428 vs 0000-0001-6258-4628). It should be noted that the ORCIDs that claim to much are not necessarily due nefarious or trolling intentions, even though a few appear so. Certainly many are are due to laziness, such as claiming everything with a particular last name. Some cases appear to be due to test engineers (e.g., 0000-0001-7243-8157; 0000-0002-1595-6203), or librarians assisting faculty (e.g., ; 0000-0003-3289-5681), or group/laboratory IDs (0000-0003-4234-1746), or having contributed to an article in capacities other than authorship such as an Investigator, an Editor, or part of a Collective (e.g., 0000-0003-2125-4256 as part of the FlyBase Consortium on PMID 22127867), or as a "Reply To" in which case the identity of the article and authors might be conflated. The NLM has, in the past, limited the total number of authors indexed too. The dataset certainly has errors but I have taken great care to fix some glaring ones (individuals who claim to much), while still capturing authors who have published under multiple names and not explicitly listed them in their ORCID profile. The final dataset provides a "matchscore" that could be used for further clean-up. Four files: person.tsv: 7,194,692 rows, including header 1. orcid 2. lastname 3. firstname 4. creditname 5. othernames 6. otherids 7. emails employment.tsv: 2,884,981 rows, including header 1. orcid 2. putcode 3. role 4. start-date 5. end-date 6. id 7. source 8. dept 9. name 10. city 11. region 12 country 13. affiliation education.tsv: 3,202,253 rows, including header 1. orcid 2. putcode 3. role 4. start-date 5. end-date 6. id 7. source 8. dept 9. name 10. city 11. region 12 country 13. affiliation pubmed2orcid.tsv: 13,133,065 rows, including header 1. PMID 2. au_order (author name position on the article) 3. orcid 4. matchscore (see below) 5. source: orcid (2019 ORCID Public Data File https://orcid.org/), pubmed (NLMs distributed XML files), or patci (an earlier version of ORCID with citations processed through the Patci tool) 12,037,375 from orcid; 1,06,5892 from PubMed XML; 29,797 from Patci matchscore: 000: lastname, firstname and middle init match (e.g., Eric T MacKenzie vs 00: lastname, firstname match (e.g., Keith Ward) 0: lastname, firstname reversed match (e.g., Conde Santiago vs Santiago Conde) 1: lastname, first and middle init match (e.g., L. F. Panchenko) 11: lastname and partial firstname match (e.g., Mike Boland vs Michael Boland or Mel Ziman vs Melanie Ziman) 12: lastname and first init match 15: 3 part lastname and firstname match (David Grahame Hardie vs D Grahame Hardie) 2: lastname match and multipart firstname initial match Maria Dolores Suarez Ortega vs M. D. Suarez 22: partial lastname match and firstname match (e.g., Erika Friedmann vs Erika Friedman) 23: e.g., Antonio Garcia Garcia vs A G Garcia 25: Allan Downie vs J A Downie 26: Oliver Racz vs Oliver Bacz 27: Rita Ostrovskaya vs R U Ostrovskaia 29: Andrew Staehelin vs L A Staehlin 3: M Tronko vs N D Tron'ko 4: Sharon Dent (Also known as Sharon Y.R. Dent; Sharon Y Roth; Sharon Yoder) vs Sharon Yoder 45: Okulov Aleksei vs A B Okulov 48: Maria Del Rosario Garcia De Vicuna Pinedo vs R Garcia-Vicuna 49: Anatoliy Ivashchenko vs A Ivashenko 5 = lastname match only (weak match but sometimes captures alternative first name for better subsequent matches); e.g., Bill Hieb vs W F Hieb 6 = first name match only (weak match but sometimes captures alternative first name for better subsequent matches); e.g., Maria Borawska vs Maria Koscielak 7 = last or first name match on "other names"; e.g., Hromokovska Tetiana (Also known as Gromokovskaia, T. S., Громоковська Тетяна) vs T Gromokovskaia 77: Siva Subramanian vs Kolinjavadi N. Sivasubramanian 88 = no name in orcid but match caught by uniqueness of name across paper (at least 90% and 2 more than next most common name) prefix: C = ambiguity reduced (possibly eliminated) using city match (e.g., H Yang on PMID 24972200) I = ambiguity eliminated by excluding investigators (ie.., one author and one or more investigators with that name) T = ambiguity eliminated using PubMed pos (T for tie-breaker) W = ambiguity resolved by authority2018
published: 2021-05-01
 
This is the first version of the dataset. This dataset contains anonymize data collected during the experiments mentioned in the publication: “I can show what I really like.”: Eliciting Preferences via Quadratic Voting that would appear in April 2021. Once the publication link is public, we would provide an update here. These data were collected through our open-source online systems that are available at (experiment1)[https://github.com/a2975667/QV-app] and (experiment 2)[https://github.com/a2975667/QV-buyback] There are two folders in this dataset. The first folder (exp1_data) contains data collected during experiment 1; the second folder (exp2_data) contains data collected during experiment 2.
keywords: Quadratic Voting; Likert scale; Empirical studies; Collective decision-making
published: 2021-04-30
 
This repository includes scripts and datasets for the paper, "Accurate Large-scale Phylogeny-Aware Alignment using BAli-Phy" submitted to Bioinformatics.
keywords: BAli-Phy;Bayesian co-estimation;multiple sequence alignment
published: 2021-04-29
 
Global assessments of climate extremes typically do not account for the unique characteristics of individual crops. A consistent definition of the exposure of specific crops to extreme weather would enable agriculturally-relevant hazard quantification. We introduce the Agriculturally-Relevant Exposure to Shocks (ARES) model, a novel database of both the temperature and moisture extremes facing individual crops by explicitly accounting for crop characteristics. Specifically, we estimate crop-specific temperature and moisture shocks during the growing season for a 0.25-degree spatial grid and daily time scale from 1961-2014 globally for 17 crops. The resulting database presented here provides annual crop- and event-specific exposure rates. Both gridded and country-level exposure rates are provided for each of the 17 crops. Our results provide new insights into the changes in the magnitude as well as spatial and temporal distribution of extreme events that impact crops over the past half-century. For additional information, please see the related paper by Jackson et al. (2021) in Environmental Research Letters.
keywords: Crop-specific; weather extremes; temperature; moisture; global; gridded; time series
published: 2021-04-28
 
An Atlas.ti dataset and accompanying documentation of a thematic analysis of problems and opportunities associated with retracted research and its continued citation.
keywords: Retraction; Citation; Problems and Opportunities
published: 2021-04-22
 
All code in Matlab .m scripts or functions (version R2019b) Affiliated with article “Temperate and chronic virus competition leads to low lysogen frequency” published in the Journal of Theoretical Biology (2021) Codes simulate and plot the solutions of an Ordinary Differential Equations model and generate bifurcation diagrams.
published: 2021-04-22
 
Author-ity 2018 dataset Prepared by Vetle Torvik Apr. 22, 2021 The dataset is based on a snapshot of PubMed taken in December 2018 (NLMs baseline 2018 plus updates throughout 2018). A total of 29.1 million Article records and 114.2 million author name instances. Each instance of an author name is uniquely represented by the PMID and the position on the paper (e.g., 10786286_3 is the third author name on PMID 10786286). Thus, each cluster is represented by a collection of author name instances. The instances were first grouped into "blocks" by last name and first name initial (including some close variants), and then each block was separately subjected to clustering. The resulting clusters are provided in two different formats, the first in a file with only IDs and PMIDs, and the second in a file with cluster summaries: #################### File 1: au2id2018.tsv #################### Each line corresponds to an author name instance (PMID and Author name position) with an Author ID. It has the following tab-delimited fields: 1. Author ID 2. PMID 3. Author name position ######################## File 2: authority2018.tsv ######################### Each line corresponds to a predicted author-individual represented by cluster of author name instances and a summary of all the corresponding papers and author name variants. Each cluster has a unique Author ID (the PMID of the earliest paper in the cluster and the author name position). The summary has the following tab-delimited fields: 1. Author ID (or cluster ID) e.g., 3797874_1 represents a cluster where 3797874_1 is the earliest author name instance. 2. cluster size (number of author name instances on papers) 3. name variants separated by '|' with counts in parenthesis. Each variant of the format lastname_firstname middleinitial, suffix 4. last name variants separated by '|' 5. first name variants separated by '|' 6. middle initial variants separated by '|' ('-' if none) 7. suffix variants separated by '|' ('-' if none) 8. email addresses separated by '|' ('-' if none) 9. ORCIDs separated by '|' ('-' if none). From 2019 ORCID Public Data File https://orcid.org/ and from PubMed XML 10. range of years (e.g., 1997-2009) 11. Top 20 most frequent affiliation words (after stoplisting and tokenizing; some phrases are also made) with counts in parenthesis; separated by '|'; ('-' if none) 12. Top 20 most frequent MeSH (after stoplisting) with counts in parenthesis; separated by '|'; ('-' if none) 13. Journal names with counts in parenthesis (separated by '|'), 14. Top 20 most frequent title words (after stoplisting and tokenizing) with counts in parenthesis; separated by '|'; ('-' if none) 15. Co-author names (lowercased lastname and first/middle initials) with counts in parenthesis; separated by '|'; ('-' if none) 16. Author name instances (PMID_auno separated by '|') 17. Grant IDs (after normalization; '-' if none given; separated by '|'), 18. Total number of times cited. (Citations are based on references harvested from open sources such as PMC). 19. h-index 20. Citation counts (e.g., for h-index): PMIDs by the author that have been cited (with total citation counts in parenthesis); separated by '|'
keywords: author name disambiguation; PubMed
published: 2021-04-19
 
Dataset compiled by Yushu Xia and Michelle Wander for the Soil Health Institute. Data were recovered from peer reviewed literature reporting results for three soil quality indicators (SQIs) (β-glucosidase (BG), fluorescein diacetate (FDA) hydrolysis, and permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC)) in terms of their relative response to management where soils under grassland cover, no-tillage, cover crops, residue return and organic amendments were compared to conventionally managed controls. Peer-reviewed articles published between January of 1990 and May 2018 were searched using the Thomas Reuters Web of Science database (Thomas Reuters, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) and Google Scholar to identify studies reporting results for: “β-glucosidase”, “permanganate oxidizable carbon”, “active carbon”, “readily oxidizable carbon”, and “fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis”, together with one or more of the following: “management practice”, “tillage”, “cover crop”, “residue”, “organic fertilizer”, or “manure”. Records were tabulated to compare SQI abundance in soil maintained under a control and soil aggrading practice with the intent to contribute to SQI databases that will support development of interpretive frameworks and/or algorithms including pedo-transfer functions relating indicator abundance to management practices and site specific factors. Meta-data include the following key descriptor variables and covariates useful for development of scoring functions: 1) identifying factors for the study site (location, year of initiation of study and year in which data was reported), 2) soil textural class, pH, and SOC, 3) depth and timing of soil sampling, 4) analytical methods for SQI quantification, 5) units used in published works (i.e. equivalent mass, concentration), 6) SQI abundances, and 7) statistical significance of difference comparisons. *Note: Blank values in tables are considered unreported data.
keywords: Soil health promoting practices; Soil quality indicators; β-glucosidase; fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis; Permanganate oxidizable carbon; Greenhouse gas emissions; Scoring curves; Soil Management Assessment Framework
published: 2021-04-18
 
This dataset contains all the code, notebooks, datasets used in the study conducted for the research publication titled "Multi-scale CyberGIS Analytics for Detecting Spatiotemporal Patterns of COVID-19 Data". Specifically, this package include the artifacts used to conduct spatial-temporal analysis with space time kernel density estimation (STKDE) using COVID-19 data, which should help readers to reproduce some of the analysis and learn about the methods that were conducted in the associated book chapter. ## What’s inside - A quick explanation of the components of the zip file * Multi-scale CyberGIS Analytics for Detecting Spatiotemporal Patterns of COVID-19.ipynb is a jupyter notebook for this project. It contains codes for preprocessing, space time kernel density estimation, postprocessing, and visualization. * data is a folder containing all data needed for the notebook * data/county.txt: US counties information and fip code from Natural Resources Conservation Service. * data/us-counties.txt: County-level COVID-19 data collected from New York Times COVID-19 github repository on August 9th, 2020. * data/covid_death.txt: COVID-19 death information derived after preprocessing step, preparing the input data for STKDE. Each record is if the following format (fips, spatial_x, spatial_y, date, number of death ). * data/stkdefinal.txt: result obtained by conducting STKDE. * wolfram_mathmatica is a folder for 3D visulization code. * wolfram_mathmatica/Visualization.nb: code for visulization of STKDE result via weolfram mathmatica. * img is a folder for figures. * img/above.png: result of 3-D visulization result, above view. * img/side.png: result of 3-D visulization, side view.
keywords: CyberGIS; COVID-19; Space-time kernel density estimation; Spatiotemporal patterns